12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBad or good project?
Leading reported evidence
Run forest
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run forest' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run forest' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Probably not a good project car unless you are very skilled and live near Hayward, CA. What, rollers (blown engines) are going for $4,000 to $7,000 these days? This chassis is definitely NOT a roller. Engine condition is unknown so we have to assume it's toast. I also see the car doesn't have keys, which means you'll need an immobilizer and matching key(s), which is expensive if bought new. Don't forget the cost of transporting the car to wherever you live.
Finally, the ending price is unknown. So unless this goes for super-cheap(!) about the only thing it's good for is parting out. IMHO, YMMV.
Man... even without the status of abandon that it shows... there is nothing correct on that car.. front GT2 bumber with a wrong lip, rear turbo/4s bumper, but with an aero taco wing... with high milleage
I wont even think about it...
Samcrac. His was in much better shape and I believe similar milage. This thing looks fairly beat all around. Could be a good parts car but it just looks like too much of a headache.
If you own a body shop then it *might* be worth it. But the aftermarket body parts parts and general condition of the car tells me there would likely be a lot of surprises waiting for you once you tore into it.
