7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCamshafts deviation
Leading reported evidence
Check monthly
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So now I consider theses number as a baseline and I will re-check monthly for major changes.
Leading evidence: 'Check monthly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check monthly' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What�s important is to watch for changes over time, checking for wear debris in the oil filter along the way
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What�s important is to watch for changes over time, checking for wear debris in the oil filter along the way
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I use Durametric 6 software and I would like to know if you think theses readings could be correct or if its possible that the software ,DME or sensor could be an issue?
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I use Durametric 6 software and I would like to know if you think theses readings could be correct or if its possible that the software ,DME or sensor could be an issue?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi
I bought a Durametric a couple weeks ago and Im now testing it on different things on my C4S 02'.
Today I did a run and had a look at the camshaft deviation.
Deviation for bank 1: -0.98
Deviation for bank 2: 0.76
The deviations are steady from hot idle to 5500rpms
Is this even possible? I dont want to look for problems, the car runs perfectly, theses numbers are also very good based on Porsche specs of 0" +/-6deg but close to 0 with an engine at 150000kms is hard to believe.
Last time I drop the pan no debris were found.
I use Durametric 6 software and I would like to know if you think theses readings could be correct or if its possible that the software ,DME or sensor could be an issue?
I will post a Log file of the deviation, actual and spec camshaft angles tommorrow.
Walk slowly away form the doubt and nobody gets hurt.. LOL Your < a 2 degree split..
Remember it changes at RPM Heat, load etc.. I think mine are just slightly higher..
They are off by almost 2, and the tolerances are up to 6, so it�s fine, but not perfect. It�s not the absolute value relative to zero, it�s the difference between them that�s most important. A car with -2 and -4 is about the same as yours.
What�s important is to watch for changes over time, checking for wear debris in the oil filter along the way
Glad to read its not uncommon.
Understand me well, Im very satisfied by theses numbers but Im pretty much starting from zero and want to get the baseline for most of my engine spec so that's why Im asking questions. So now I consider theses number as a baseline and I will re-check monthly for major changes.
Here's the log from today.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
