26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHoil leak-IMS?
Leading reported evidence
Use so loosely in mechanics, you have
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The term "rebuild" is used so loosely in mechanics, you have to get a clear estimate that's itemized in writing to know what "rebuild" means by the shop that will carry out the work.
Leading evidence: 'Use so loosely in mechanics, you have' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'ok tow' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect filter, pull the pan' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Probably a ok tow with a truck/u-haul and car trailer.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd get a oil analysis and inspect the filter, pull the pan.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
the repair price doesn't seem crazy, but when i did my ims it included replacing the rms as well.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If the guy that did the rebuild installed any IMS bearing other than the LN Engineering IMS Solution, it will mean it's time to replace the bearing anyway.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If the guy that did the rebuild installed any IMS bearing other than the LN Engineering IMS Solution, it will mean it's time to replace the bearing anyway.
Replace rms as well as the ims bearing, three hours
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Three hours to remove the gear box, one hour to two hours to remove the pressure plate, clutch, flywheel, and change the RMS as well as the IMS bearing, three hours to put the gearbox back, one hour for oil change test drive and misc...
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
(...plus some loctite flange and wicking sealants, new bolts for the flywheel and pressure plate, a couple of aluminum sealing rings for the chain tensioners and a green cap/seal for the camshaft, plus it makes sense to do an oil/filter while you are there since you just drained all the oil.) Once you are there, it is easy and inexpensive to replace both seals.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Three hours to remove the gear box, one hour to two hours to remove the pressure plate, clutch, flywheel, and change the RMS as well as the IMS bearing, three hours to put the gearbox back, one hour for oil change test drive and misc...
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The term "rebuild" is used so loosely in mechanics, you have to get a clear estimate that's itemized in writing to know what "rebuild" means by the shop that will carry out the work.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
i'm just surprised and slightly pissed that i have to fork out more $$ when i already spent lots and thought i had the problem solved for a while
i have an '02 C2 996, engine rebuilt 25 k ago, don't ask why...
now there's a leak out of the back, got an estimate for IMS replacement for $3k
the entire IMS assembly can be bought for $700 plus labour
am i getting gouged by my supposedly trusted mechanic?
is it IMS or RMS? any feedback would be great
thx
There is no way to know if it is RMS or IMS flange leak until you take it apart. Manual or Tiptronic? (tip requires engine removal, manual doesn't
require
it, but it is an option). It is a fair amount of labor, and depending on the shop's rate that may not be that outlandish.
i have an appt tomorrow at $145/hr, they say they don't need to pull the tranny to give an estimate.my other shop said 3 hours to take the tranny out.
both are reputable shops, why the difference?
one guy is obviously overcharging for the parts.
can i get away with replacing the seal, the bearing, both or the whole shebang?
i'm trying to save $$ as i already spent tons on getting the motor redone
if the engine was completely rebuilt would they not have replced the IMS assembly?
they said they did.
why would it start leaking after only 25k
am i getting f*d?
it's a six speed
thanks
vancouver bc
all the prices are in $cdn except for the IMS assembly
the shop is charging $2k for the IMS and i can get them online for USD 700 or so
thx
the repair price doesn't seem crazy, but when i did my ims it included replacing the rms as well. if your quote covers both, i think its reasonable but i'm sure other will respond who know more than i do about these issues.
good luck
Time isn't the main factor for the RMS. There have been several iterations of the RMS. The original ones are more prone to leaking than the updated ones. As far as IMS, you need more information. There is the IMS, and the IMS bearing. There are a few choices in aftermarket IMS Bearings, with the LN Engineering being the preferred one by most. There is a single row bearing and a single row pro (retrofit of a double row into a single row fitment. There is also the IMS Solution which is more costly, but permanent.
The parts cost to fix a RMS or IMS flange leak is nothing - there is a seal on the IMS flange and a rear main seal. Like well under $40 in seals. (...plus some loctite flange and wicking sealants, new bolts for the flywheel and pressure plate, a couple of aluminum sealing rings for the chain tensioners and a green cap/seal for the camshaft, plus it makes sense to do an oil/filter while you are there since you just drained all the oil.) Once you are there, it is easy and inexpensive to replace both seals. That's just the seals, not the IMS Bearing. For the IMSB there are lots of different options as Bill outlined above, at all kinds of different price points. What is costing you is the labor - there is no way to see the RMS or the IMS flange with the transmission installed. So, to diagnose, you need to tear it all apart. Once you are there, then you just add the cost and incremental labor to do the bearing. Yes, it will add up to thousands for a shop to do it.
Rebuilt 25K ago, but how long ago was it done? I'd be talking to the shop that did the rebuild first and see what they say.
Is the $2K quote for the LN IMS Solution (best option) or ceramic bearing?
The rebuild was done in November '16, the guy gave me a 2 yr warranty, which has now conveniently ran out.
the car ran great with no issues
It was the first place i called - the shop is out of business, the joke is on me.
thanks for your input
Aloha!
i'm just surprised and slightly pissed that i have to fork out more $$ when i already spent lots and thought i had the problem solved for a while
the problem is that it might be easy to fix if you can do it yourself, i'm a mechanical engineer, but without the experience and a hoist in the garage i'm sort of reliant on mechanics, their time, shop rates and parts markup.
i know it might be easy and relatively inexpensive
anyway, i know i'm whining, but it's a surprise i didn't need
thanks for your input
best
**** happens, just be glad you're not dealing with something catastrophic. Maybe (hopefully) an older version RMS seal was used and now needs replacing.
Three hours to remove the gear box, one hour to two hours to remove the pressure plate, clutch, flywheel, and change the RMS as well as the IMS bearing, three hours to put the gearbox back, one hour for oil change test drive and misc... That is 9 hours. At $145 per hours, that is about $1300. The IMSB is $700 US (LN ceramic, I think, not the Solution) so now we are at about $2500 Canadian dollars for the repair. That is not too far from the $3K price.
As for the engine rebuild work, it was over 2 years ago without any issues. The car was driven 25Kmiles, no issue under the warranty period. I don't know if you can honestly place any blame on the engine rebuilder. This is a Porsche, one with a couple of well known issues. It costs to own this car. Everyone knows it. I know the repair is a surprise to you and that is bad but no one ever promised that Porsche ownership is going to be cheap.
For comparison, I am spending $1000US on my daughter's Audi A3 to change the starter, alternator, radiator and some hoses so she can take it to college at end of summer. My labor is free.
My wife's 997 just costs me $1000 in parts for brakes. My labor is still free.
It is costly to own German cars. I knew that when I signed up.
I am not certain of anything unless I see it with my own eyes.
If the fluid is motor oil, and it is coming from the bell housing/engine seam, then there are three sources I can think of: RMS, IMS Bearing flange/bolts, or seam between engine halves. If it is gear oil, then it could be the input shaft seal on the transmission. If it is brake fluid, then it could be the slave cylinder. I can't think of other sources offhand. RMS and IMS flange are the common culprits as far as I know.
+1,Over 3 years and 25k miles and you think he still owns the car and is just letting you drive it? Probably one of the reasons he closed shop and moved away to restore old Porsches. Track him down and make him fix it, JK, yea you are whinning, just get you a lift and start doing your own repairs, you may have a change of heart..
There is a certified by LN shop in Seattle..
Probably a ok tow with a truck/u-haul and car trailer.
I'd get a oil analysis and inspect the filter, pull the pan.
Just in case its too deep to repair. (they would do that)
Did your guy pick the IMS that was used? He should have had
a long discussion about the actual selection of parts with you.
Things that support and seal things that rotate fast dont last forever. I agree that 25k seems low but there have been many reports of low milage cars with failing ims or cam runout that will cause leaks. Maybe the guys did something wrong or didnt check something correctly but it could easily just be bad luck.
This whole thread is a bit perplexing. You had a rebuild carried out on a 2002 Carrera in 2016 that came with a 2-year warranty. Now, 25,000 miles and three years later you're wondering if you got the shaft? Now, after all that time and money, you're not sure what they did during the rebuild? Really??? The term "rebuild" is used so loosely in mechanics, you have to get a clear estimate that's itemized in writing to know what "rebuild" means by the shop that will carry out the work. Instead of ranting further, why not help us all and post the itemized invoice on the work that was carried out on the car in 2016. Do you have it?
Seriously, I wouldn't walk around with a defeated attitude. The person that did the so called "2016 rebuild" fulfilled his obligation. Things happen with this engines that defy all normal mechanical logic. We're talking 31 modes of failure, man! Heard of them, yet? My best advice is pull yourself up by the bootstraps and attack the problem one step at a time. Dropping the transmission on these cars is not a fast job by no means and a $2-3K estimate for IMS replacement is pretty good in my opinion. If the guy that did the rebuild installed any IMS bearing other than the LN Engineering IMS Solution, it will mean it's time to replace the bearing anyway. Out of warranty... is OUT of warranty.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.