fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

well, you knew this was coming

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHwell, you knew this was coming

Leading reported evidence

Replace edmunds is reporting

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

While most of the changes will be minimal, consisting of a few minor cosmetic and powertrain changes, Edmunds is reporting that a high-ranking Nissan exec confirmed the updated car would lose the current version�s launch control system."

Original post Read captured discussion
well, you knew this was coming
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace edmunds is reporting' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace edmunds is reporting' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace edmunds is reporting

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

While most of the changes will be minimal, consisting of a few minor cosmetic and powertrain changes, Edmunds is reporting that a high-ranking Nissan exec confirmed the updated car would lose the current version�s launch control system."

Original post Read captured discussion
well, you knew this was coming
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

http://www.motorauthority.com/report...-for-2009.html "The Nissan GT-R has finally filtered its way into the retail channels of most global markets, with a fair number of customer cars on the streets. But just as those owners are getting familiar with their cars, Nissan appears to be working on a slightly revised and upgraded version for sale in 2009, tentatively dubbed the Series II. While most of the changes will be minimal, consisting of a few minor cosmetic and powertrain changes, Edmunds is reporting that a high-ranking Nissan exec confirmed the updated car would lose the current version�s launch control system."

POST 2Original post

The GT-R has all the right performance numbers but I've seen one in person and I really don't like the way it looks.

POST 5Original post

Have seen a couple on the road, but not up close.The performance value and numbers are great...just not the looks .

POST 6Original post

I know it's a hell of a car... but for some reason it just does not "do it for me" ..

POST 7Original post

I dont care if its faster... its FUGLY as all get up...obviously designed to get the Honda tuna can exhaust pipe drivers all excited... go have fun guys.... still I bet it drives very well... just no appeal to me in any way

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.