15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHInspired by Chad
Leading reported evidence
Use photoshop several years ago
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use photoshop several years ago' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check white balance' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used the same lousy tools - MS Paint and PowerPoint.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In the future you might want to check the white balance setting on your camera.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In the future you might want to check the white balance setting on your camera.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This took waaaay longer than I care to admit, using MS Paint and PowerPoint.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
OK guy's lets see the sigs that you tried on your own, after seeing Chads magical hand:
Chad's spiffy sigs really inspired me to try my hand at photoshop. I don't really take beauty shots of the Porsches and I have never used Pshop for more than cropping and reducing photo's, (as my handiwork shows), but I never imagined there is so much you can do. My Photoshop came free with my camera so if there were directions I never saw them. Anyway thanks Chad for making me kill 3 hours with grueling Pshop labor.
JK
You can do a lot of things for Photoshop. One of the areas that Photoshop is really good at is photo processing (as the name implies.) The picture you attached had a strong cyan cast on it. It was hard to tell what color your car is from the picture. With a quick color balance adjustment and a little bit of curves adjustment in Photoshop I think this new picture looks more accurate.
I know the change is pretty subtle but you can see in the wheels and the windows that the cyan cast is gone. In the future you might want to check the white balance setting on your camera. Make sure it is not set for "cloudy" or "flourescent lighting" when shooting outdoor pictures on a sunny day.
Mine was inspired by the T-Shirt I had made for DE events. On the front of the T it says "Hi, my name is UFO" in one of those badge formats and on the back it says "How's my driving? 1-800-HEEL-TOE."
THanks for the adjustment P. I got some crap for it when I first took pictures to show the new rims. Improper fstop taken at dusk with the Leica on point and shoot mode. Everything got a greenish hue.
I have three and started to change them depending on the season. I didn't do a Fall sig yet though. By the way, the snow, rain and lens flare are all photoshopped in.
