13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHQuestion for LA peeps...
Leading reported evidence
Recommend cec
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you're looking for stuff that looks good on the streets I recommend CEC on Willshire.
Leading evidence: 'Recommend cec' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend cec' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm in town shooting next week. As usual with these things, it's a stupid full schedule, but in case I get an hour or two off... if you were going to make one side-trip to a cool store for Porsche stuff, where would you go?
TIA!
Oh, good question... I meant stuff for the car. I've got no specific objective. It's just that there's noplace in Toronto to just go and ogle Porsche ****. Thanks for the reply!
If you're looking for stuff that looks good on the streets I recommend CEC on Willshire. If you're looking for stuff that's going to make you faster on the track you might try calling GMG and ask what projects are underway that are available for public viewing.
heh If you like anything from CEC, I'm sure you can order it cheaper through a sponsor, etc. Nevertheless, these shops don't usually carry things in stock and would have to order parts and most likely drop ship to you.
Hmmm... should have been clear about that. This is LA, after all... gorgeous day here, BTW. Between that and the traffic, I finally understand why there's such a thing as a cabrio with tip.
BTW, if you want to snap some pics of cool cars too, check out Stuttgart Performance -- same people who makes the infamous plenum! They're in Costa Mesa... they have an authentic 959 parked in their warehouse.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
