fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

C4S Suspension same as TT?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHC4S Suspension same as TT?

Leading reported evidence

Replace add up

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

These changes add up to a 20% reduction in roll stiffness from the rear bar of the Turbo compared to that of the C4S."

C4S Suspension same as TT?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace add up' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace add up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace add up

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

These changes add up to a 20% reduction in roll stiffness from the rear bar of the Turbo compared to that of the C4S."

C4S Suspension same as TT?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T070717Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Just wondering if they work for both models. They look the same from what I've seen....also trying to get a price range for a used set? thanks

POST 2Original post

similar?... my guess the spring rates are different.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7333665

Good point. Reason is I have stock C4s Suspension, and my buddy with a turbo wants to go back to stock maybe and were not sure if it would work..

POST 5Original post

My understanding is that they are the same... but I don't know that for a fact.

POST 6Original post

Simillar, but not the same. They are tuned to each models particular weight. The part numbers are also different for the turbo and the C4S, whether it is for the stock sport suspension or for the upgraded X73 aftermarket.

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 7334444

Exactly. The valving of the shocks I think is a little different - not sure about the spring rates. The stock C4S rides on the M030 sports suspension. The upgrade to this as Palting said, is the X73. If you try to find the X73 online you have to look under the Turbo's suspension parts... but when you order... you specific you have a C4S and not a Turbo. Fwiw.

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 7334444

Palting, welcome back!!! Haven't seen you here in a while. Do I need to do an update of your avatar pic, or do you still own the 996 and the Boxster as shown?

POST 9Original post

HI Tim!! I just occasionally lurk here now. Nice to see some of the old crowd keep active on Rennlist. Yup, still have the the two cars in the avatar, an avatar made by good friends

POST 10Original post

According to the April '02 article in Excellence about the C4S: "In lieu of the Turbo spring rates, Wahl (Porsche development engineer) selected coils 10% less stiff. They also have less pre-load to accommodate the C4S' lighter weight." "..while the rear (sway) bar on the C4S is 1mm smaller than that of the Turbo. Also the walls of the rear anti roll bars on the C4S are thinner than those of the Turbo as well, at 2.8mm vs. 3.0mm. These changes add up to a 20% reduction in roll stiffness from the rear bar of the Turbo compared to that of the C4S." "The rest of the actual hardware of the front and rear suspension- the links, longer rear axle control arms, bushings, motor mounts - is identical to that found in the Turbo." Hope that helps.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.