28 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRennlist has been SOLD!!!
Leading reported evidence
Replace back
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No wonder my membership just changed back to User.
Leading evidence: 'Replace back' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check back in may' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Yeah I read this announcement and congrat's to John and Jen, now they can use some of the additional funds for there charity too
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
28 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all....anyone notice the announcement at the top of each page? Yes...it's true...Jen and John have sold RL....sounds like a great opportunity for them as well as a plus for the future of RL.
https://rennlist.com/forums/announcement.php?f=60&a=67
CONGRATS JEN AND JOHN!!!!
Thanks for everything. This forum is essential for my day...every day.
Best of luck to both of you.
Jon
I hope John and Jen made some money here, but I think for them it may be more important to get their lives back. In any case, thanks for all the years of *very* hard work on your end, so the rest of us could enjoy our play time even more.
Congratulations and best wishes on whatever you do from here, and especially the Haiti project.
=Carlos=
Matkap - you have to understand. Rennlist, is more than simply just a forum. It is a way of life. Most of us have been on here since the beginning. Email lists, then forums...John has done a great thing to bring all of us together. Rennlist is an institution.
C.
I guess it pays to read the announcements! Good for John and Jen! Now they can relax at their new Villas in Spain, London, and Miami, without worrying about the day to day Rennlist upkeep!
Yeah I read this announcement and congrat's to John and Jen, now they can use some of the additional funds for there charity too
I hope this doesn't mean that membership fees will go up
They had to sell it to start there new Ferrari forum. Since the sold the porsches and bought matching Enzos!!! I wish I had a chance to buy it, I didnt see this in the want ads!
Congratulations! It's nice when a "labor of love" pays off!
Let's hope the "character" of Rennlist doesn't change. I frequent a boating site that was bought by IB and the level of censoring has gotten so bad that people are moving to other sites.
I mailed her a check back in May. She said she would go looking for it and I never heard back from her but I stayed a member so I thought it was ok. Yesterday morning I turned back into a User and emailed her but didn't hear back yesterday or today. I'm sure they're super busy right now so I'll touch base with her next week. It's just wierd to be limited again and and my PM's -- oh boy. I'm sure it'll get worked out. I'm five Porsche's in so I should just Lifetime it anyway...