19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSlow..........
Leading reported evidence
Use crap
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Seems to me that anyone who still uses the crap after all the problems it causes in Porsche and other engiines, is either brain dead or knows jack **** about engines.
Leading evidence: 'Use crap' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use crap' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
No, it's just me using an emoticon as a copout so I don't haven't to be that person
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use crap
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Seems to me that anyone who still uses the crap after all the problems it causes in Porsche and other engiines, is either brain dead or knows jack **** about engines.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
WHAT IN THE BLUE HELL IS GOING ON IN HERE?!!?!?!?!?!?!?! Damn, I actually go to work today and give a few lectures and miss this? I really need to cancel class more often
If you want action, why not ask about Mobil Water and admit that it is tearing your engine apart? Seems to me that anyone who still uses the crap after all the problems it causes in Porsche and other engiines, is either brain dead or knows jack **** about engines.
I'm unsure, but I think such a question might create some nice activity between those who are right (like me) and those who are wrong (like most of the rest of you).
Or, start another poll and claim that it is statistically accurate. That will get Dell to chime in a few times.
It's North Carolina...it's mellowing you. Does that to everyone that moves there. It's why they speak so slowly. The symptoms do not, as of yet, have a cure.
Ohhh myyy God. Come on Dell....copout/Dell...Dell/copout That just doesn't work for me
What this forum needs is MORE COWBELL
And you are just the man for the job...DELL
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
