15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHlooking to put a price on a 996
Leading reported evidence
Install <1yr and 5k miles ago
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
how about placing a value on this one: 2002 c2 with 85k miles and a new crate engine installed <1yr and 5k miles ago.
Leading evidence: 'Install <1yr and 5k miles ago' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install <1yr and 5k miles ago' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T064914Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
like I always tell people (and this is proof) NEW parts add very little...maybe 5-10% broken/worn/damaged parts are a huge hit and deduct full value
so if you cop out $15k for a new motor your car is worth $1500 more than one without - but break the motor and the car is worth $10k LESS than it was
BTW anyone need any parts ?
I am going to say upper teens maybe low 20's when the wether gets better. The thing that it really has going for it is the fact it is under 100K miles you can still put a warranty on it! After it hits 100K mid teens and it will keep dropping from there
how about placing a value on this one: 2002 c2 with 85k miles and a new crate engine installed <1yr and 5k miles ago. tip, black on black, in good shape. work done by dealer so there is 1 more yr of warranty.
toying with the idea of getting a turbo...
how about placing a value on this one: 2002 c2 with 85k miles and a new crate engine installed <1yr and 5k miles ago. tip, black on black, in good shape. work done by dealer so there is 1 more yr of warranty.
I would think about $23-25k
Well the only for sure thing is. If you dont at least start out asking that price, you will nto get that price. All you can do it try. What year? Look at NADA retale values on a 99MY.... 14-18K
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
