14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNewbies..watch before posting
Leading reported evidence
Check box
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
We're all kidding around about this...but in reality IT SHOULD be a mandatory part of joining the forum...with a check box that defaults to the video clip after which the applicant is then directed to the check box that says "I agree" to the forum policies.
Leading evidence: 'Check box' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check box' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check box
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
We're all kidding around about this...but in reality IT SHOULD be a mandatory part of joining the forum...with a check box that defaults to the video clip after which the applicant is then directed to the check box that says "I agree" to the forum policies.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
i agree.... this should be a mandatory film to watch once a newbie joins....... is there a way to default it once you sign up?
thanks for sharing........that's the bomb
We're all kidding around about this...but in reality IT SHOULD be a mandatory part of joining the forum...with a check box that defaults to the video clip after which the applicant is then directed to the check box that says "I agree" to the forum policies.
Hey John....waddaya think? It might pay for itself in the amount of admin time you have to devote to dealing with the same issues.....sorta like the department of redundancy department.
Ok. I'm gonna put my 2 cents worth in. I'm a fairly newbie so I can relate. If you want this forum to be a couple of people talking back and forth about porsches, go ahead and insure the newbie strickly follows rules he just came in contact with. Of course, you could just IM each other then. Remember when you 1st came on? Did you read all previous forum responses and all the technical data before you posted your 1st topic for fear someone would blast you for bringing up a previously discussed topic? If you did, you have more time than I do. I joined(yes, joined...I'm a paying member) to share in your information and expertise and hopefully pass it along to someone when you're not on-line or are off driving F1's in the future. So far I've learned a lot more about my 2 porsches than I knew 3 weeks ago. I'm not an expert on this site and I guess haven't taken the time to navigate all the areas I could or possibly should before asking ?? or sticking my nose in. All I can say is thanks for being patient w/me and I hope you're that way with the guys that join tomorrow...I'll know I'll be.
...I know...I'm off topic
Added that video link to the 'Forum Guidelines' topic.
Pat - thanks for your Member support of Rennlist - it is appreciated!
Let me know if your status is not updated to 'Member' within a couple days.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
