8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnybody have Aftermarket Warranty Experience?
Leading reported evidence
Repair non-critical items, and already feel it has paid itself
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The 3rd party insurance covered almost everything (I still had to pay my excess), but I have only repaired non-critical items, and already feel it has paid itself.
Leading evidence: 'Repair non-critical items, and already feel it has paid itself' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair non-critical items, and already feel it has paid itself' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I have contacted them and they have been quite nice and easy to work with however I have not taken the car in for the repair yet.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Not sure if you were asking me but I used Prizm Administrative Solutions.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Repair non-critical items, and already feel it has paid itself
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The 3rd party insurance covered almost everything (I still had to pay my excess), but I have only repaired non-critical items, and already feel it has paid itself.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
When I purchased my 99' 996 I purchased a aftermarket extended warranty (non-CPO, non-porsche warranty). I paid for the top warranty that covers pretty much everything including seals. I have never had to use it but now I am fairly certain that I have a RMS leak. I don't really care about the leak but since I have the warranty, I was going to try to get it fixed.
This sounds kind of stupid but when I purchased the warranty, I was very skeptical. I have contacted them and they have been quite nice and easy to work with however I have not taken the car in for the repair yet.
Has anybody had any experiences with aftermarket warranties from private companies? I think my warranty is from Prizm (I don't have my paperwork with me).
I got my '02 C2 Coupe in November and because there was no factory warranty remaining (and I wasn't 100% sure of the history of the car), I purchased a 3rd party warranty. (I also opted for the 'Platinum' level which pretty much included everything).
After 3 months, the stock radio (CDR-220) made a strange 'thud' sound whenever it turned off (and also when I increased and decreased the volume), and I had an annoying rattle near the passenger side airbag. My dealer discovered the rattle to be related to the door catch (in which case it is a structural part rather than cosmetic), so that was repaired and the radio was swapped out with a factory reconditioned part.
The 3rd party insurance covered almost everything (I still had to pay my excess), but I have only repaired non-critical items, and already feel it has paid itself.
I would therefore recommend it - I have had a good experience.
I've got the same one. It's about half paid for already (bought car a year ago, got the highest level), and I think tomorrow it will finish paying for itself.
I live in California and want to protect my new purchase with an extended warranty. Does Fidelity offer this to end users or do I have to go through a dealership? Right now I am waiting for Warranty Direct to sell their products directly to consumers in California, but another option is always welcomed. Their website didn't provide for an online quote either, so if you could give me a price point, that would be appreciated. What did you pay for your coverage? This will help me avoid paying above market costs.
Thanks.
myrmidon, is that warranty supposed to cover the clutch? They're telling me it doesn't.
Nevermind, I got the car back and looked at the paperwork...doesn't cover the clutch. Shoot. Need to find an indy in the area.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
