29 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHStrosek Rear Wing
Leading reported evidence
Install stosek rear wing today, here are some pics
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Installed a Stosek Rear Wing today, here are some pics before and after.
Leading evidence: 'Install stosek rear wing today, here are some pics' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean now' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
C4S - it does replace the retractable unit, it was used and my friend got it cheap
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
29 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T094842Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
we can't see from the picture, but as i recall the strosek as a huge opening right under the top of the wing (that is obscured in the picture) for air...
Guys thanks for all the feedback.
evo-333 - I will take some pics directly of the rear and post
C4S - it does replace the retractable unit, it was used and my friend got it cheap
Joe2000 - it is a 2001 Cab, I do not have the matching nose and I did not get a chance to wash it before I took the pics. Canadian snow, it's clean now.
Dell - No clearance issues at all, fits perfectly
ElTorrente - actually there a two ducts at the front of the wing that funnel air into the engine bay
kilrgt - I am from Toronto also and I have always wanted a GT2 wing but not too sure how it would look on a cab
GT2 wing on a cab is overkill......IMHO.
....course there are people who don't even think wings & cabs mix.
Besides Strosek, the only other wing I care for on a 996 cab is this one.
Won't fit.........but I think
MA Shaw
and-or
Getty Design
have look-alikes..........if memory serves the wing is stationary (and 100% retraction not recomended).
