fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Cabrio owners may like this.

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
23 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCabrio owners may like this.

Leading reported evidence

Run some tests....i heard it was "military grade" technology...whatever

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Wife has it....have not really used it yet...maybe i'll borrow it and run some tests....I heard it was "military grade" technology...whatever that means...lol...

Cabrio owners may like this.
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run some tests....i heard it was "military grade" technology...whatever' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run some tests....i heard it was "military grade" technology...whatever' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 23 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run some tests....i heard it was "military grade" technology...whatever

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Wife has it....have not really used it yet...maybe i'll borrow it and run some tests....I heard it was "military grade" technology...whatever that means...lol...

Cabrio owners may like this.
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

23 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Does anyone have this yet? http://www.jawbone.com/ Click on the Demo. I just ordered one, I hope it sounds ok. There are no real tests showing how people sound in your ear though. People complain about my Jabra JX10 Another video.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB3_us51b6o

POST 2Original post

Interesting. Let us know how it turns out when you get it.

POST 3Original post

hmmmmmm sounds a little bit like you're in a tunnel...... but doesn't amplify as loud..... i like it though...

POST 4Original post

I guess I'm a gopher too. I looked up the Jawbone,read some reviews,looks good,ordered it,just now. The "Porsche" of bluetooth headsets!

POST 5Original post

let u sknow how this works out... very much intrerested!

POST 6Original post

I do have it and it works wonderfully. Keep in mind it can not block out wind? It only blocks out background noise with its noise canceling technology. Nothing can stop the pressure the wind puts on the mic except blocking it. But it does do a great job with the windows down and the system up if you are wearing it on your right side.

POST 7Original post

I also have it, had for about a month now and works great and looks great too. And I too wear it on the right side.

POST 8Original post

Very interesting.... thanks for the link and posts. I wonder if this will let me voice dial with the top down? Anybody doing that with it now? =Carlos=

POST 9Original post

I just bid on one..on ebay. $100 max bid. The MSRP is around $120..so lets see if I win it!

POST 10Original post

Wife has it....have not really used it yet...maybe i'll borrow it and run some tests....I heard it was "military grade" technology...whatever that means...lol...

POST 11Original post

where is best place to get one? i'd like to try it out too.

POST 12Original post

IT means that if the military uses it the quality to probably good, but the tax payers paid 1,000% to 5,000% more for it than we should have paid.

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I ordered mine from www.treocentral.com but later found it at www.avediamedia.com a company I've never heard of before for alot less.

POST 16 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Do you have a problem hearing people when driving topless?

POST 17Original post

Only when they scream in terror when they see my love handles.

POST 18 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I set you up good for that one, huh?

POST 19Original post

The receiving sound also automatically adjusts depending on the level of ambient noise surrounding you. I have found it to be sufficiently loud but I roll a hardtop with a sunroof open, not fully open air.

POST 20Original post

I wonder if it would work in a nightclub.......as if we need more geeks walking around with these things on trying to look cool.....

POST 21Original post

Seriously it works well with the top down, However that's with the windows up and the windscreen up.

POST 22 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I received the product and everyone I call is impressed even my picky *** brother. On my end it is hard to hear when trying to pull the outrageous examples on the videos of this product. They may hear you but you will have a hard time hearing them. But under normal circumstances, people turn down the radio from level "22" when talking to someone without a hands free device. Cabrio owners who drive the HWY know how loud it gets especially when passing 18 wheelers the people I had on the phone couldn't even tell I was passing one. Another time a Harley with it's loud exhaust came past me and the guy I was talking to said he didn't hear it at all. The video tests seem to exclude what is heard when you, the Jawbone user, are not talking. It is then people hear more background noise. The noise of course to the folks on the other end of the call, is not loud but still heard until I talk; and my voice is easy hear over any type of background, even the wind pressure(wind pressure is the not 100% muted(more like 40%) unlike all other sounds I've encountered so far while I'm talking).

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.