11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNice REJEX story....
Leading reported evidence
Use polish, cleaner
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
They washed, they used polish, cleaner, everything they had.
Leading evidence: 'Use polish, cleaner' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use polish, cleaner' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use the stuff on everything from the cars to glass table tops to granite counter tops and even porcelain in the bathrooms.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Another story on Rejex:
One of my guys in the office is a firefighter, and they burned a house down one weekend for training. A white honda was nearby and got covered in soot when the wind shifted.
After the training exercise, my guy (young guy, just getting into the car stuff) was talking with his chief about the car being covered. The owner was quite upset, and the crew decided to take the car to a detail shop to get it cleaned.
NOTHING would get the soot off. They washed, they used polish, cleaner, everything they had. The entire fire station was working on it.
My guy ran into his truck and grabbed the bottle of Rejex I gave him a few months back for his own vehicle. They started in on the soot covered white Honda, and IT CAME RIGHT BACK TO ORIGINAL.
The chief was overwhelmed, thinking they'd have to spend a few grand to repaint the car!
Amazing stuff. Yeah, it really works. Just did the Porsche again today. Amazing, easy on, easy off, no biggie.
Interesting...Rejex as a cleaner. I found Rejex to be the easiest wax/coating to put on and take off. Lasts a long time too!
I recently bought Optimum Poly seal...that is supposed to be easy, and a good swirl remover AND protective coating all in one. Stay tuned.
I guess you sold me...I just placed an order. I washed my car for the first time of the season. I was just thinking "man I need to wax this thing". I hope its all its cracked up to be.
I don't think even the Rejex folks consider the story application to the product in any way, but it DID just that....so I would not recommend it, and it was a last resort, but it did the trick in this case.
Might have just been the right combination of chemicals at the right time....
does rejex have a shelf life? I have a 3/4 full bottle I haven't used in 2 years since I started taking the care to a detail place, but I'm not happy with the results and think I'll do it myself again...
I was told that the shelf life was somewhere between 8mo to 1yr, but I bought a case about a year ago and the few remaining bottles seem fine. I use the stuff on everything from the cars to glass table tops to granite counter tops and even porcelain in the bathrooms.
Btw, don't use it on the tub
