fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

C4 vs C2 on wet streets

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHC4 vs C2 on wet streets

Leading reported evidence

Run across the entire road...unavoidable

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Yes under NORMAL circumstances that you can see and predict...the amazing thing about the C4 is its ability when you DONT expect it....for example...I was driving through the amazing twisties of Mulholland drive....having a blast...hit a blind corner at a high rate of speed...but I couldnt see the hydrant spewing water into the ditch and the 10 foot wide section of mud running across the entire road...unavoidable.

C4 vs C2 on wet streets
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run across the entire road...unavoidable' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run across the entire road...unavoidable' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 19 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run across the entire road...unavoidable

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Yes under NORMAL circumstances that you can see and predict...the amazing thing about the C4 is its ability when you DONT expect it....for example...I was driving through the amazing twisties of Mulholland drive....having a blast...hit a blind corner at a high rate of speed...but I couldnt see the hydrant spewing water into the ditch and the 10 foot wide section of mud running across the entire road...unavoidable.

C4 vs C2 on wet streets
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T022239Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Any tangible advantage to the C4 when it's wet out? I live in a climate where it's relatively wet (rain) between November and February. My G35 will kick out every so often but the traction control keeps it within reason. I imagine a 996 (especially one without PSM) will break out more..true?

POST 2Original post

The 911 has way more weight in the rear. I really doubt it would break out more.

POST 3Original post

A C4 will have ALOT more traction in the wet...its how the AWD system works in it...when the car detects wheel slippage, it diverts power away from that wheel and moves it to the wheels that are not slipping....it works VERY well.

POST 4Original post

Definitely a C4 in the wet to be more secure. I get crazy with my C2 when it rains and I often freak myself out, call it sick, but I LOVE IT

POST 5Original post

My '00 C4 is incredibly stable in the wet. Even in the torrential downpours we get here in the Florida thunderstorms. I don't usually take the car out when this type of weather threatens. I have got caught a couple of times. I don't overdrive the car in these situations, expecting the AWD and PSM to bail me out. But, I'm amazed at how unperturbed the car is. Especially considering the wide, warm weather performance tires.

POST 6Original post

Unless you are experiencing monsoons in Vancouver and the water is literally flowing down the streets, it really isn't going to make that much difference unless you are driving the streets like you are on the track.......

POST 7Original post

There's not a lot of downside to getting a C4 if it's something you're worried about. It's going to be a lot more confidence-inspiring in wet conditions for sure.

POST 8Original post

Never owned a C2 but I've owned many different AWD and 2WD vehicles over the years and I notice the advantages of AWD is when accelerating (especially from a stop). It feels like the car is just stuck to road. AWD is particularly useful when accelerating when not all 4 tires have the same traction e.g. when the rears are on ice or gravel.

POST 9Original post

x2 Your choice of tires is FAR, FAR, more relevant to your experience than C2 vs. C4. With the same tires, would the C4 be better in the wet? Sure. Is it worth it to get a C4 for those times assuming it is dry most of the time, no way. If you are driving responsibly on the roads, a C2 or a C4 should be plenty stable during wet conditions. If you are road "kill" boy, then by all means, go right ahead . . .

POST 10Original post

I have S03s for tires and no PSM on my car. I have no problems in the wet. Even lifted off in a corner in the wet, it tracks true. I can apply about 90% throttle in the wet (not standing water) withough spinning in 1st and full throuttle beyond that. (I can't say the same thing for my 79' S/C, which is a beast in the wet). These are extremely stable cars. Tires will probably be the biggest factor since they will determine your limits long before the front wheels are applied power in a C4. In snow where you need more tracking, it is a far differente story. I can see a significant advantage in the snow in a C4 over a C2.

POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Great replies, thanks. I agree that tires probably matter more than the AWD as a first defense for sure. I've noticed that on my current car as well (tire degradation and performance).

POST 12Original post

The C4 is about 250lbs (or thereabouts) heavier than the C2. So the added weight does slow you down a little. Stability in adverse conditions? If you have constant conditions, you can figure out your limits in the C2 and adhere to them. If the conditions vary (aka puddle of water, patch of ice/snow, small patch of gravel/sand) then I think the AWD wins hands down no matter what tire you have (bald tires excluded). My main experience is when that one rear wheel catches that change in conditions, and your car has that brief lack of control....in AWD you have 3 other wheels to keep your direction true. thanks, Amir

POST 13Original post

The C4S is awsome in the wet. Particularly when you hit one of the puddles on the right side that would normally cause the car to pull to the right. The AWD straightens that out pretty good. I'm a fan of AWD having owned an Eagle Talon and an Audi S4 before getting the C4S. The Audi and the Porsche are about equally good with each being true to its nature. The Talon was pretty good but no match for the other two. AWD makes you look real good in bad weather.

POST 14Original post

I have a C2 and actually came from a G35 coupe. The C2 feels ALOT more stable and I have a lot of confidence in the car. I don't drive in the rain but the few times I've been caught with the 911, it's been great. I don't think you need a C4. I have yet to even trigger PSM since I've owned the car...

POST 15Original post

It's not that much weight C2 Coupe 2000 Manual =2909.9 to 3042.2 Empty C4 Coupe 2000 Manual =3031.3 to 3152.6 Emtpy That only 110.4 to 121.4 lbs difference On a side note. You are going to get 100 different answers on this one. Go drive both in the wet There is a reason Porsche makes an AWD "Whether that be performace in (rain snow or sand) or just to put more money in their pocket that for you to decide

POST 16Original post

And to add.... I chose a 2 over a 4 because it could be driven looser. In the wet with good tires it's not really an issue - yes the 4 IS more stable but if you want to drive on rails - get a train. The best time of the year is here - snow, turn off the traction control and enjoy the car. There is somewhere a great clip of a C2 in snow at the Ring

POST 17Original post

I come from old school 911 driving. The 996 C2 is much easier to drive and more stable than the the older 911s. After spinning out and facing traffic one too many times in my old 911, I swore my next one would be a C4. I don't regret it one bit. I can still get the *** out if I want to, even w/PSM on, and like other C4 owners have said, w/the correct throttle input it tracks like it's on rails. I don't have room in the garage for a train.

POST 18Original post

Similar to the adage about real estate with the Porsche it's all about tires, tires, tires. I have a 99 C2 (non PSM, non Traction control) and with decent tread I have yet to spin the tires when I wasn't trying. I drive this car through every weather condition in Florida, torrential downpours, light mist, fog, standing water you name it but when you have tread on the tires the car is exceptionally stable. I wouldn't hesitate to take it anywhere....as a side benefit it's pretty fun to go to a wet parking lot and learn how it behaves at the (fairly high) limits. But if your tires are heavily worn you will not have a fun day. This is where a C4 or PSM car would be handy. I've personally never seen the need but ymmv.

POST 19Original post

Yes under NORMAL circumstances that you can see and predict...the amazing thing about the C4 is its ability when you DONT expect it....for example...I was driving through the amazing twisties of Mulholland drive....having a blast...hit a blind corner at a high rate of speed...but I couldnt see the hydrant spewing water into the ditch and the 10 foot wide section of mud running across the entire road...unavoidable. Hit the mud, all 4 wheels slid, car began to slide, PSM and AWD kept the car facing the right direction until the tires regained traction after the mud....I had perfect tires...Happened again to me on a freeway interchange I always take...its a 3 lane banked high speed sweeper....I can take it easily at 90+.....Once I took it at about 85, not that fast really...car must have hit an oil slick or something becase the back end slid out, PSM kicked in...PSM light flashing, then before I even knew what had happened....it was corrected and moving right along with virtually no intervention from me...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.