15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHJK Motor Sports Header on eBay
Leading reported evidence
Check " around and found claims ranging
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I assume they "checked" around and found claims ranging from 0-20hp from other vendors and decided to pull 30+hp increase out of their **** to try and out-lie the others.
Leading evidence: 'Check " around and found claims ranging' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check " around and found claims ranging' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check " around and found claims ranging
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I assume they "checked" around and found claims ranging from 0-20hp from other vendors and decided to pull 30+hp increase out of their **** to try and out-lie the others.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi - never heard of them. I searched the web and could only find reference to JK Tyres, but nothing to do with headers.
Anyone have any insights?
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?...6508&rd=1&rd=1
I assume they "checked" around and found claims ranging from 0-20hp from other vendors and decided to pull 30+hp increase out of their **** to try and out-lie the others.
But they have a 98.7% positive feedback rating - doesn't eBay enforce honesty in all their posts and double-check each claim made so buyers get the best possible information?
Sorry can't say that with a straight face.
The first thing I noticed is the small tubing. The tubing is significantly smaller than the port size and hence why thye have the cones going to the flange. The collector is also very questionable since there is no merge to it (just 3 tubes protruding inside). I would be very questionable to any gains from these headers. In fact, since the tubing is actually smaller than the stock header; I wouldn't be surprised if they lost HP.
1 3/4" primaries is not small! If anything they could be too large.
No way the stock peice is as large as those. I dont see the problem with these, they have nice welds, and they went for $157. Sounds like a steal to me. They may not make 30hp but they look like most 996 headers that places try and get $2000 for. Sure they may not work as well but at $157 they are certianly worth the gamble.
