19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 RUF Kompressor (supercharger)
Leading reported evidence
Install by an approved evo installer
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
it needs to be installed by an approved evo installer.
Leading evidence: 'Install by an approved evo installer' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install by an approved evo installer' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The RUF SC seems to be 2yrs/20k miles and the engine needs to be < 40k miles, engines > 50k need to be replaced which adds to cost, engines between 40 and 50 can be fixed apparently.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
That somehow worries me, thats 1 to 1.5 years max since I use the car as my daily ride.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
i am using pagid yellows on the track and bhp on the street.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Their intercoolers are built into new intake manifolds that replace the factory units.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The RUF SC seems to be 2yrs/20k miles and the engine needs to be < 40k miles, engines > 50k need to be replaced which adds to cost, engines between 40 and 50 can be fixed apparently.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Good Morning,
I would like to move up from my 2.5 Boxster, am currently looking at a pristine example of a 2001 996 Cab. Very low mileage (25000km)
But would like a little more horses, hence am considering a RUF Kompressor. The supercharger they introduced last year.
Has anyone ever tried this on their car? Whats the impressions you have.
Should I expect other modifications than just a bolt on of the compressor (brakes, suspension) I know this car has the P-sport suspension factory fitted.
Would appreciate your comments
Many thanks
Ronny
i don't think there are many RUF SCs out there because it is so friggin expensive. most ppl, have the EVO/vortech supercharger.
the RUF SC is NOT just a simple bolt on. you have to remove the engine. disassemble the heads to install a gasket to lower the compression and install new intake plenums specifically made for the SC. the kit is highly engineered but there is a price to pay in parts and labour.
the EVO is truly a bolt on kit. i think youhave to remove the engine for the TPC SC kit.
all good things in life are expensive.
In Europe actually there's a lot of tuners, but onlytwo are very well known and supply you with a warranty.
Hence RUF and Gemballa.
I understand that indeed it's an engine out exercise, I wouldnt have expected anything else. A just bolt it on exercise would worry me.
But then I would like to hear from guys that have a supercharger installed on their 996'er and what are the things to look out for.
Thanks
Ronny
I met two guys at a DE who run their 02 996 EVO SC cars on the track with no problems. I also met the guy who installed them. I was skeptical of the reliability until I met these guys. They drive HARD and have not experienced any problems on the street or track in the past 1-2yrs.
k
you are SOOOOO right chris. when it's installed right it's be reliable, and more powerful than the Ruf kit. it needs to be installed by an approved evo installer. we both know about the dyno on the Ruf SC. they won't post the results. i wonder why... hmmmmmm if it made more power or it was at least on par then they would definitely post their results.
Ahh yes, but not all 'installers' are the same. the local guys(evo trained) here have only done a few, and the results are questionable to say the least.
yipes! that's not good.
there's a guy from toronto, ca who had mike from evo do the install. you know that install has got to be "proper". not sure who paid for the plane ticket and hotel though
Karlooz, sounds you have a good set up for your 996, saw your pics she looks realy hot.
Anyway isn't it so that whatever SC ones chooses the installation needs to be spot on.
But in a way it does not matter which SC one chooses, I have the feeling the enigne can really handle it
But Karlooz as far as I can see you did change quit a bit on your car
What are the absolute MUST DO items when considering a SC.
Lets say we go for something like 50 to 75 extr BHP
This EVO chaps I assume they are local to the US right?
But then there's alos quit a few European supplier, of course headed by RUF and Gemballa
Enjoy your eastermonday
ROnny
Hey Carlos what pads are you running with your stoptechs? I have the pagid orange. They're great but I am really getting tired of the NOISE during daily normal driving. thanks.
i am using pagid yellows on the track and bhp on the street. i tried using the yellows on the street but i couldn't take the squealing. i even chamfered the leading edges but they still squealed. the bhp pads are really good. i was told by stoptech that they are the highest temp rated street pads and are actually ok for light track use. they come with anti squeal pads adhered to the backs of the pads. they don't give out much dust and have better than stock cold bite. kinda pricey.
You are right Jon, I definitely want a cab. Taht is a must, got an C4s 2004 offered for cheap money but a coupe and I had to say no thank you.
And a good condition TT is MORE MORE expensive
Regards
Ronny
Ronny,
First you can't just bolt on the Ruf compressor. It is not just sold as a kit. It is sold as a conversion. Your car will need to go to Ruf for the conversion. Unlike EVOMS, they remove and disassemble the engine to install thicker head gaskets to lower compression. On a standard Carrera, it lowers from 11.3:1 to 9.7:1. They then add 8.8 lbs (EVOMS is only 6 lbs) of boost. Other elements of their kit is substantually more sophisticated than the EVOMS kit. Their intercoolers are built into new intake manifolds that replace the factory units. This allows Ruf to use the stock airbox, instead ot being forced to suck hot engine air. Sport cats are also included to reduce the exhaust back pressure. So, keep in mind that although it is double the price, it includes more components, all labor and a warranty on the car that you are not going to get elsewhere.
To be honest, if you don't already own the car and are looking to spend the extra money, why not just look at a Turbo instead or move up an 02'+? With the compessor, EVOMS or TPC kits; 3.4l's make about 50 hp less than 3.6l's. The 3.4l will only be on par with a stock Turbo, while the 3.6l will be more equal to a Stage 1-2 Turbo. A nice low mileage 01' Turbo will be in the 60's today.
Plus, you can get a decent warranty on a TT. The RUF SC seems to be 2yrs/20k miles and the engine needs to be < 40k miles, engines > 50k need to be replaced which adds to cost, engines between 40 and 50 can be fixed apparently. That said, u figure, u can trust RUF, plus resale on a 996 + RUF is likely higher than a 996 + Evo, no?
Gents thanks for the wise words, indeed to TT or not to TT is the question.
And thats a matter of money, you see I can do a very good deal on this C2, plus the car has low mileage 25K km.
But even then as we speak I am having a look at tt cars. But I definitely want a cab and am not sure whether the early 996TT came as cabs?
Regarding RUF, well the conditions to install the RUF SC on this car are favorable (low mileage) and then theres the resale.
But do I read this right that a RUF SC will only last about 20K miles. That somehow worries me, thats 1 to 1.5 years max since I use the car as my daily ride.
Of course one could say drive this C2 as it is for two years, sell it for the same money you bought it for now and then upgrade to a 2003 or 2004 996 TT cab.
I still have a bit of time to reflect on these matters.
Thanks for all the comments they are much appreciated
Regards
Ronny
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.