fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Amberectomy - BUYER BEWARE: XenonMods.com

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAmberectomy - BUYER BEWARE: XenonMods.com

Leading reported evidence

Replace after money switches hands

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Amazing how quickly things change after money switches hands.

Amberectomy - BUYER BEWARE: XenonMods.com
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace after money switches hands' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace after money switches hands' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 20 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace after money switches hands

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Amazing how quickly things change after money switches hands.

Amberectomy - BUYER BEWARE: XenonMods.com
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hello Rennlist! Allow me to vent and please keep this in mind when shopping online! Especially when shopping at XenonMods.com I've been having a very negative ongoing experience with XenonMods.com (in particular, with Rich Calnan). It is posted below in hopes of keeping fellow 996 owners on watch for similar shady business practices. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- When inquiring into light bulb part numbers, prior to my purhcase, Rich was extremely quick in responding to my emails. Amazing how quickly things change after money switches hands. October 29th I purchased 6 bulbs off his website and received an email confirming the purchase (my credit card was immediately charged). After two weeks of receiving nothing, I sent multiple emails asking for a tracking number for the bulbs. I heard nothing back. I contacted my credit card company and reversed the charges. Weeks pass. December 14th 2009 A package arrives, dated DECEMBER 10th 2009! Shortly thereafter, I receive an email from Rich containing accusatory terms such as "scammer" for reversing the charge. After communicating with him and finding out the charges were in fact, reversed, I immediately sent the unopened package back to him and promptly provided him with a tracking number. Today Fast forward to today, January 15th. I get a letter from my credit card company that he is STILL fighting to have my account charged! Rich has offered no excuse and no apology for his atrocious customer service and has left me questioning his business integrity. I wish I had this information before starting this entire transaction. Good luck with your decision!

POST 2Original post

Thanks for posting this herein. That's why the Rennlist exists--to surface the names of the deadbeats out there.

POST 3Original post

I have only had one buying experience with Xenonmods and it went off without a hitch.

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 7227560

yeah, I just emailed him to get his side of the story. Figured he should have the chance to defend himself

POST 5Original post

I have bought a few items from Xenonmods with no issues.

POST 6Original post

sad - I bought from them and tell people about their products regularly... never had or heard of an issue. Then again I have heard they do from time to time............ when I last spoke to them they said they were focusing on customers form thier own website and had given the ebay folks the back seat. I didnt quite understand how a customer could be anything more then "a customer" no matter where they found your product from. Anyhow, IMO you had the bulbs, why didnt you just keep them..... too pissed to let them have your business?

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7227892

Yep

POST 8Original post

like I said before - sad....they "had" a good deal going, I hope they fifure it out before it costs them more than your business... GL on the new vendor and please post up your findings so we all can have the option of where to buy as well.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7227892

And FYI, I bought the bulbs directly from the website. Issues surface in all businesses. I understand this. I worked in customer service for several years. But an honest business does not fight to collect money on a product that has been returned - especially when the package was sent 42 days after it had been ordered, (20 days after I cancelled the order). Sounds like some people have been treated properly-- and that's great. Like I said: good luck.

POST 10Original post

We dont roast until we have all the fuel. After we hear his side we will kindle the fire and roast the proper party.

POST 11Original post

its surprising how a $30 transaction can be the reason you loose your business - but it can be if enough people hear about it..... I am hopeful they do something to make it right AND offer the reason for the issue OR we find a new dealer who isnt willing to act that way.

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7228150

By all means. But I won't hold my breath waiting (again).

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7228152

I concur 110% At the very least, hopefully their practices will not be shoveled onto another. But no reason has been given AND the situation is not being made right. After all, they're still barking at my credit card company. And I don't know why - Rich has the bulbs AND I'm out the shipping fee! LoL

POST 14Original post

Quotes source post: 7228152

Obviously he isn't as bright as his bulbs, as it cost the merchant $20 to fight a chargeback, win or lose! He's already out $20 and if he continues it will cost him at the very minimum $50 to challenge it. (Ask me how I know!!!) I have an e-commerce business and when you deal with chargebacks you have to know when to throw in the towel - right or wrong! Tony

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7228419

Makes sense. However, Rick has been in possession of a tracking number since January 4th (and therefore, knows his light bulbs are in his PO Box), he is perpetrating a fraud against my credit card company by fighting this! Pretty serious.

POST 16Original post

Here is his personal response to me. He admits he ****ed up. Here is his reply. I believe it. Why would he continue to chase the money after he got his parts back? Do you have any idea what kind of PITA that is? I don't have a side on this one. I screwed up the shipping. He filed a charge back with his credit card against me. (not with Paypal so it could be resolved, with the credit card directly). I provided tracking number to the charge back through Paypal. Charge back was reversed in his favor, and he had the bulbs. I awaited return of the bulbs as he promised, and I got them. He's got his money back and I've got the bulbs in hand. Aside from the initial screw up, doesn't look like a big deal at all. (p.s.- I'm not continuing to fight the charge back, it was a Paypal transaction so they fight it on my behalf and I can't stop them. It's all between them and the CC company now) Feel free to post this response on your message board. Thanks, Rich

POST 17 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

In light of that response, I will retract my statement about his fradulent behavior in continuing to demand payment. But the appalling level of customer service stands true and has never been explained. I think you'd agree with me -- one shouldn't have to reverse charges (with his/her CC company or with paypal) to get goods (or an email) from a seller. You know what I mean? But as I stated perviously, hopefully no one else on here will have to go through the same aggravation! Good luck.

POST 18Original post

I've never bought from Rich but he's been around for a few years and gets lots of good press here but every once and a while he seems to slip up and when he does it seems to get handled poorly. To bad because if he had just admitted he screwed up but was trying to make it right his reputation wouldn't get so blemished. Seen similar "buyer beware" posts regarding Xenonmods on other forums as well. https://rennlist.com/forums/porsche-...ight=xenonmods https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...ight=xenonmods

POST 19Original post

Quotes source post: 7236464

I understand your stance 100%. I can surely understand why you popped a fuse when you thought he was still trying to collect from the CC company. But we all **** up once in a while. Hopefully he is just having some growing pains and is under staffed. In that awkward stage of too big for one but too small for 2. I am a small business owner and if you have 3 hours let me tell you how hard it is to please everyone and not screw one up once in a while.... I think he did what was right in the end. You got your money, he got his bulbs. Maybe in a little while you can kiss and make up. PS and he has a point, you filed the charge back with your CC company not paypal. at that point you kinda took the control away from him to properly issue you a refund. Thus amplifying the whole situation... No I am not saying its your fault. But it could have been eaiser.

POST 20 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7236928

There are multiple people working at that business. Look, there's a difference between "screwing up" and blatantly ignoring a customer who has paid. I feel like I'm beating a dead horse on this issue but it is completely inexcusable! Out of curiousity, what exactly did he "do" in the end that was right? Would it be refunding my money? Because he didn't (how could he when he refused to respond) Come on. Lets not kid ourselves. What he did do was send the package after the funds were removed so that he'd have a leg to stand on when demanding $$$$. And are you kidding me about Paypal vs. my CC company? Why on God's green earth would I give a seller control over a situation that he has not been able to handle? Clearly the task of communicating the whereabouts of the bulbs was too difficult, exactly like the task of SENDING the bulbs. But for some reason I should have trusted him to make it right? C'mon man, be reasonable.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.