9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWanted: Stock exhaust cans
Leading reported evidence
Use 2003 3.6 cans
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used the 2003 3.6 cans for my mod a long time ago.
Leading evidence: 'Use 2003 3.6 cans' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set 04 c2' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just a bit of advice fellas. If you want the "hook-up" with free cans you are more likely to get them if you support the very community that allows you to ask for the cans gratis.
You will notice that supporting this community for a whopping $18 will reap benefits beyond your wildest dreams (........enter ***** Wonka).
Sure you might get a set of cans from another member but most guys will really go out of their way to help out another member. HMMMMMM.......let's see, $18 for a set of cans is a fair deal IMHO.
I totally agree with Dell. Whole "advice" is always free and can be read by anyone on the Forum, when it come to offering freebies, it just seems like one is more prone to help a MEMBER than a Registered User.
It is really not about the $18, either. I guess it is more about the common willingness to support the site that we all enjoy. I was a Registered User for aboout a month, found that I really liked the site better than others, then signed up to be a Member for two years. Two years for $36 is cheaper than a tank of gas, and the enjoyment lasts much longer!
Not ALL cans will work for the PSE mod. The 99 cans will not. You need to get the cans that hace the recessed nipple. I used the 2003 3.6 cans for my mod a long time ago. Look at my posting here:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...&highlight=pse
I do want to do the mod and have 99 cans now. Also, Dell and Gota911 I just joined for two years. not sure why I did not before I am a PCA member#2005120094.
Thanks for any help here
Len
The photo in a previous thread looked like a piece of aluminized carbon steel welded to the 997 can. That would not be a good thing to do. Use 304 and TIG.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
