10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHConsidering 996, need info please...
Leading reported evidence
Clean ppi
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
At this point I would probably stay away unless you get a very clean PPI.
Leading evidence: 'Clean ppi' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean ppi' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In order to CPO a car you would have to negotiate with a Porsche dealer go through the charade to have the dealer "buy" the car, repair, certify and CPO the car, and "sell" it to you.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Register (it's free) and you can use the search to find the answers to all your questions and more.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In order to CPO a car you would have to negotiate with a Porsche dealer go through the charade to have the dealer "buy" the car, repair, certify and CPO the car, and "sell" it to you.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm interested in a 2002 911 Carrera Coupe for sale in my area. It has 50K miles, tiptronic, PSM, full leather, Xenons, CD, rear wiper, flared rocker panels, etc. The car looks very clean, but don't they all. Upon start up, it belched a lot of white smoke and quickly cleared up. Engine sounded good. The seller (wholesaler middleman type) says the startup smoke is typical of boxer motors that have sat for a week or two (he said this one had sat that long; I believe him because battery was a little weak, too). Asking price is $40K. I was a little spooked by the smoke and left without driving it. Here are my questions:
1) Is the smoking normal if it sat for a week?
2) Where is the best place to get a pre-purchase inspection? Dealer? Independent?
3) What does a typical PPI cost?
4) Does $40K sound too low for this car if it's mechanically sound?
5) Am I crazy for considering a 50K mile 911 with no warranty? If so, is it possible to have Porsche certify the car (CPO) and extend the warrany? If not, are there any 3rd party warranties worth considering?
I really like the car, but have these concerns. Please tell me if I'm being seduced into future misery or if it's OK to proceede with caution.
1) A little smoke on start-up is normal
2) Dealer
3) Not sure
4) 40K sounds a little low for an '02 even with 50,000 miles
5) A Porsche dealer could probably CPO it (it cost the dealership around $1,600), but I doubt they would unless you purchase it from them.........and no you are not crazy.
Register (it's free) and you can use the search to find the answers to all your questions and more. In the meantime, let me get you started:
1) Don't know, but my car doesn't smoke after sitting for 1 week. Ask about it at the PPI.
2) Porsche dealer can get information an independent cannot e.g. warranty repair history, original selling dealer's #, TSB, recalls, original factory options etc..
3) $200-300, it's another $200-300 if you want a compression test.
4) You're in the right ballpark for a non-CPO car according to edmunds.com
5) CPO is only available via a Porsche dealer (or buying a car w/ balance of a CPO from a private individual). In order to CPO a car you would have to negotiate with a Porsche dealer go through the charade to have the dealer "buy" the car, repair, certify and CPO the car, and "sell" it to you. There are lots of 3rd party warranty companies, some good, some bad, you're going to have to do some research.
Good luck
I'm a total noob here but as someone who has been shopping 996s for the past month, I will say that price does seem a touch low for the car descibed.
-Mike
My car is a 99 with 58000 miles and it doesn't smoke on startup whether it's been sitting or not.
At this point I would probably stay away unless you get a very clean PPI.
When you say white smoke, was it white or was it bluish? If it's white that's coolant burning, very bad. If it's bluish then that's oil, and according to PCA (and some people here IIRC, or maybe it was another forum) that's normal for a horizontal engine (it's on its side, some oil will get by the rings and into the combustion chamber when parked).
i bought mine...55K miles.... $40K is cheap..my 99 cab/tip went for 42K last Sept. do a PPI and get an extended warranty.
I found this site after I bought my P, but will do it differently now that I know all I learned on rennlist.
The smoke looked very white to me. If it seems too good to be true, it probably is (may be coolant smoke), but I'm still thinking of getting a good PPI if I trust the shop (Phoenix area dealer won't do PPI, so I have to go to an independent).
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.