17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMix-Match MKI & MKII Aero Parts?
Leading reported evidence
Run with the proper kit
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think you answered your own question, yes you can physically do it but you're probably better off in the long run with the proper kit.
Leading evidence: 'Run with the proper kit' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run with the proper kit' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
For pre-facelifted 996s, what are your thoughts about mixing MKI & MKII aero parts? For example, MKI front bumper with MKII side skirts? I prefer the looks of the MKII side skirts, so I'm wondering if this is a mod faux-pas if the parts aren't from the same kit. I've seen some such examples in the sale ads, but has anyone on this forum done this?
TIA,
Charlie
^ but the front bumper, which can be argued to be the main focal point of the aerokit, would be a Mk1 style. so with Mk1 style front, and MK2 sides and rear, yes his car does look stunning, and i don't believe he has reported any instability issues, but i'll let him chime in on that.
If I recall correctly, however, evo_333 has a Cargraphic front lip and not a full MKI front bumper. I guess my original question pertains more so to the aesthetics than aerodynamics. Is coupling an MKI front bumper with MKII skirts a styling no-no, or am I worrying too much and need a nap?
I think you need a nap ZZZzzzzzzzzzzz
It will be fine and don't worry none of your rennlist bretheren will report your transgression to Stutgart. (I wish there was a spell check in here!)
I think you answered your own question, yes you can physically do it but you're probably better off in the long run with the proper kit. I can't imagine any AD or resale advantage to having such a setup.
Hey guys,
That is correct, I have a Cargraphic front and aero II sides and aero II cf wing... I don't notice any instability at higher speeds with the addition of the body parts. In fact, I'm pretty sure it has gotten better. I was driving my buddies 40th anny the past weekend and it felt more unstable than my car... Go figure
If you are questioning looks, do a search on Kirby's car (itzkirb)... He has the aero II front and aero I sides
The MkI ones have the same lines that the MkI front has. I would NOT mix them. MkII has a harder creased line that IMHO would not look good together (front and sides).
that sucks. them's the breaks i guess, industry has gotten very compeditive. I always figured that in cali, there was plenty of customer base to support the aftermarket guys mainstream and niche. canada on the other hand....hehe
The hot rod shop business, be it porsche or whatever, is a little harsh. Not sure what happened to 969. It's all about treating the customers right (you know we are always right). Esp relevant in the internet explosion where bad news travels fast.
^ well put.
Reminds me of that ever so popular thread on the BMW owner group which lead to the creation of
www.savagebmwsucks.com
. as i recall, savage BMW's junior tech wrote off a customer's M3 while ripping it on an inspection test. Wouldn't pay out on it. Long court battle and the guy got some cash, and bought a 996TT with a huge decal on the side that said
www.savagebmwsucks.com
PWNED.
