16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSay it ain't so...
Leading reported evidence
Install neon
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I just installed neon on my TT as well as reverse vertical doors.
Leading evidence: 'Install neon' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install neon' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So today was a really nice day in Memphis, about 77 degrees on my way home from my girlfriend's place tonight. As the weather gets nice, I tend to see more Porsches coming out to play...
Low and behold, here comes a Boxster in the opposing traffic with...NEON LIGHT GROUND EFFECTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Say it ain't so. Why I ask, WHY?!?!?!?
You know, one of the cars postd here for opinions recently (a C4S I believe... probably one of the ones Arr0Gant posted) had "ground effects" posted as an option. I thought it really sad that someone would do that to a C4S.... all goes to show that just because you have money, it doesn't mean you have taste.
Not trying to offend anyone but...
That's what happens when you get below $20K????? Honestly, not everyone can afford a 911 and taste is a highly personal thing. Would I ever put ground effects on my car, no. Would I spend one second worrying about someone who did? No!
By the way, there is a 996 that has been posted many times on this site and the paint job makes it look like the Partridge Family bus. Do you think this car was purchased for under $20K?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
