19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHChanging key head
Leading reported evidence
Check their website and they're up
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I just checked their website and they're up to $198.00.
Leading evidence: 'Check their website and they're up' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check their website and they're up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I am preparing to change my original key head to the on in the image.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The process of moving the key electrics, the key body, and the RFID pill can be found on this site, and any number of other sites. The head you bought is for a two-button key, you do not have a two-button remote; before you start trying to stuff the innards from the old one into the new one, did your seller indicate that the new case is compatible with the 996 guts?
Most of the listings I see for that key head also includes the "instructions" -
"T
ransfer your current key's guts - Transfer your current metal key half, internal transmitter chip (small green pill), and remote control circuit board."
You Tube
https://www.renntech.org/topic/3675-...l-key-battery/
You Tube
I was successful in changing things over. This key works much better. I just hit the key button and it locks or unlocks. The other button serves no purpose. When I hit the button the 911 illuminated which is cool. I’m pretty happy with it. It’s a nice looking key.
I have another one I am considering selling.
They are much nicer. I could never get the bottoms on the original right. That was likely my fault because I couldn’t get used to which “lump” to press. I get further range with this key also..
Wow, I did mine last year and it wasn’t that much!
I’d also do my wife’s key, but the differing looks makes it easier to identify mine and hers.
Plus, I’m not spending $200 to upgrade her key!
I’m sure she would agree.
