fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

IMS-question...

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHIMS-question...

Leading reported evidence

Replace without a complete engine teardown

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I read that engines from late 2005 until 2008 have a different IMS bearing which cannot be replaced without a complete engine teardown.

IMS-question...
Frequently discussed work

Inspect when

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I guess I'll inspect when replacing the clutch and take it from there.

IMS-question...
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace without a complete engine teardown' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect when' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Inspect when

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I guess I'll inspect when replacing the clutch and take it from there.

IMS-question...

Replace clutch and take it

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I guess I'll inspect when replacing the clutch and take it from there.

IMS-question...
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Inspect when

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I guess I'll inspect when replacing the clutch and take it from there.

IMS-question...

Replace clutch and take it

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I guess I'll inspect when replacing the clutch and take it from there.

IMS-question...

Replace without a complete engine teardown

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I read that engines from late 2005 until 2008 have a different IMS bearing which cannot be replaced without a complete engine teardown.

IMS-question...
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

So I'm thinking about installing the LNE IMS solution when I'm having my clutch done some time in the future. As it happens, I have a 3.6L fitted in my 99 C4, and this was done in 2008. I read that engines from late 2005 until 2008 have a different IMS bearing which cannot be replaced without a complete engine teardown. Does this apply to 996 M96 engines, or only the M97/997-engine?

POST 2Original post

True for the latest models in this series, but the only way you will know what bearing you have is upon physical inspection, so you might as well make your decision after you have pulled the engine and all that.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 15004315

As I suspected... I figured I could save a few bucks by having a friend bring a new LNE-kit with him from the US, but I'll probably be better off knowing which bearing type I have by inspecting.

POST 4Original post

The trouble is, from what I�ve read, there is no easy way to know exactly what bearing you have because Porsche mixed and matched bearing and shaft types even in the same year during crossover. To make matters worse, I don�t think there�s an easy way to know exactly what engine you have. I�d let Jake and others chime in. See if you can provide an engine serial number. Not sure that will be definitive, but might help.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

So I've been told Thanks again for your help!

POST 6Original post

If it is a stock engine the serial number will pin point the year. If it was a factory rebuild then it would depend on when it was rebuilt. Factory used the bearing du jour, rebuilt in 2005 or later probably big single row. Question then is if it was in storage and and if so how long.

POST 7Original post

Start at 15:42 or watch the whole thing if you want: You Tube

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks again, guys. That video gave an excellent summary. I guess I'll inspect when replacing the clutch and take it from there.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.