13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFrom the depths of Muppet Labs: Exhaust Questions
Leading reported evidence
Install from the new opening
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The sealed "outlet" has been opened and a pipe has been fitted from the new opening to the primary exhaust pipe, which leads to the exhaust tip.
Leading evidence: 'Install from the new opening' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'funniest thing i've seen' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Install from the new opening' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Use radio....now i am thinking of tossing it completely
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No preformance increase....but I hardly ever used the radio....now I am thinking of tossing it completely to lose the extra weight!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Since I am leasing the car, I want to be able to easily change back to the stock set-up.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I had the by-pass pipes before and it was way to loud for normal use (clients always knew when I was in the PCar).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey, when you have these guys working for you you come up with some whacky ideas.
Ok, I have several sets of old C2 exhausts. And I was going to experiment with them. I have a gutted exhaust on my C2 now. I had this from a long time ago. I opened up the exhaust and esentially removed everything from the inside and had it welded back together. It sounds good. But still rather quiet.
I had the by-pass pipes before and it was way to loud for normal use (clients always knew when I was in the PCar).
I was thinking of opening up another set and essentialy putting in a U pipe from inlet to outlet with a bunch of holes in it. In theroy it should be quieter than bypasses and lounder than stock. See diagram below (pardon the stinky graphics)
Anyone ever do this? Beaker says it will be just fine but you never know with that guy.
Tim - I think Chris is referring to something like this. (Chris - if this is not what you meant, please correct me).
The first pic is the modified stock exhaust. The top "can" is stock and the bottom "can" has been modified (or hacked) to mimic the PSE. The sealed "outlet" has been opened and a pipe has been fitted from the new opening to the primary exhaust pipe, which leads to the exhaust tip.
The second pic is the factory PSE. You can see that the "hacked" stock exhaust duplicates the additional outlet pipe in the PSE.
If I had an extra set of stock exhaust cans I would do this mod tomorrow. Since I am leasing the car, I want to be able to easily change back to the stock set-up.
Interesting... the whole difference is that one extra pipe that for stock exhaust they seal? They should have just put them in all 996 stock!
Boy... I think you just came up with the solution for cheap people like me!
i was under the impression that PSE is for musical enjoyment only. No performance enhancements (at least none claimed by Porsche and I'm sure they would if they could
)
It sounds better, so you push down harder with the loud pedal.
Seriously, I was unaware that there was zero performance gain. I'm suprised if that's the case
I think since I changed to a sport exhaust (dansk Super sound) my P got about 5 sec's faster...meaning o-60 in O seconds.......or maybe I forget to clock it because I am listening to the great sound!!!
No preformance increase....but I hardly ever used the radio....now I am thinking of tossing it completely to lose the extra weight!
I just decided to forgo all the crazy self modification and buy the Agency Power Exhaust system
Oh... and something for the crowd
Top Gear Race with James, Hammond, and Jeremy
The cars: Porsches bought with only 1,500 british pounds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGP...related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GT-...related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbhC...related&search=
Probably the funniest thing I've seen
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
