7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhich size torque wrench
Leading reported evidence
Use only
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use only' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 25-250 version, hands down' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For wheel lugs, I'd use the 25-250 version, hands down.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think 02's advice about using an inexpensive wrench dedicated to wheel fastening is sound.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
How many people use a quality "certified" torque wrench?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm getting a torque wrench to install my winter tires. It's 94 ft-lbs. Is there any reason to get the Craftsman 25-250 ft-lbs ($110) instead of the cheaper 20-150 ft-lbs ($67) wrench? What kind of common DIY jobs would require over 150 ft-lbs? Thanks.
First, for a 1/2" drive just to do lug nuts I would go with a cheaper torque wrench. I have a spare I use only for lug nuts. Get a 19mm impact socket (thicker walled and black in color). At 100 ft-lbs, it isn't hard to split a thin walled socket. I would suggest saving some money and getting one from Harbo Freight:
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...Itemnumber=239
When it comes to other things like torquing down a valve body or flywheel, I would get a better microclick torque wrench.
There isn't much that requires over 150 ft-lbs of torque. Nothing in the suspension of a 996 needs it. I have only come across a couple of things that would need more. The front axle nuts on a Maxima are around 220 ft-lbs and require a special long torque wrench to loosen. The center lock nuts for the wheels on a 959 or Carrera GT require a special torque-multiplied gearset to be torqued properly.
A few things about torque wrenches,.........
1) Torque wrenches are most accurate between 80% of their ranges. Within 20% of the end of range, accuracy really falls away. For wheel lugs, I'd use the 25-250 version, hands down.
2) IMHO, cutting corners and buying cheap for such a lifetime tool is false economy given whats at stake. VERY few people every have these tools checked and recalibrated during their lifetime and I think one should buy a good one. Craftsman consumer grade used to be good but no longer. Mac, Snap-on, Stahlwille, Proto and Craftsman Professional are all OK.
Actually split beam torque wrenches are the most accurate. Steve is right that MAC, Snap-on are the most accurate, but IMO torque on lug bolts are not that crucial to be dead on accurate. Have you ever seen the dealer monkeys impact the lugs on with their Ingersol? Man they must wrench them on over 150ft/lbs. If your only doing lugs the $67 one is fine or you even can buy the Craftsman torque wrench with the bar meter torque guage. I thinks its about $30 and its pretty accurate, but does not ratchet. If your doing engine work a split beam is most accurate, but they are over $200 for a good one.
Now I could be wrong here, but precision crafted instruments are pretty unique. Scientific laboratories and agencies spend gazillions of dollars on instruments in order to ensure their accuracy to billionths of a decimal place. Put another way, measuring correctly ain't that easy. So here's the thing, if you had no problem spluring multiple tens of thousands on a 996, don't you think you could pony up a c note for a decent torque wrench? I mean, skip that movie date one night and you're done.
Having the bolts
evenly
tightened is a large part of the goal of using a torque wrench. The absoulute number might be off by some %, but the number is repeatable. How many people use a quality "certified" torque wrench? Is there a rash of wheels falling off on the track (and elsewhere) because of not using a $700 torque wrench? I think 02's advice about using an inexpensive wrench dedicated to wheel fastening is sound. These are not complicated instruments. And why wouldn't a 20-150 ft/lb wrench be accurate for wheel bolt/nut torque? 150 x .90=135 right? 135 ft/lbs is way over common wheel fastener torque specs, is it not?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.