14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGT3 Suspension
Leading reported evidence
Use other chassis (anti-sway bars, control arms)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
-all designed for C4 chassis and some parts can be used for other chassis (anti-sway bars, control arms).
Leading evidence: 'Use other chassis (anti-sway bars, control arms)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use other chassis (anti-sway bars, control arms)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Yes, the GT3 coilovers are better than the m030, and everything is adjustable. The upper mounts in front also are solid, with no rubber. A little harsher, but it actually rides no worse than my old stock 964 or my previous 993 with m030. Feels very direct- and the ride height is much lower than the m030 so be careful over dips and angled driveways!! (Don't ask how I know...)
Boy Viken, over 6000 posts! And I thought over 700 meant I was crazy!! I'd just tell redduck to get a real GT3- he won't be disappointed!! (Not everyone can be called keeper of the truth.)
skl,
Shoot... I wish!!! since i'm dreaming I mind as well shoot for the CGT.
Seriously, i'd love to but I live in DC and really can't afford it.. Eating instant noodles every night as it is.
You got alot of cars... I like..
Yes to all of the above:
front and rear shocks and springs (coilovers)
front and rear anti-sway bars
front upper mounts
front control arms
-all designed for C4 chassis and some parts can be used for other chassis (anti-sway bars, control arms).
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
