36 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTHE 997 is HERE!!!!
Leading reported evidence
Adjust throttle response, psm, pasm and tiptronic shifting speeds
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It can adjust, throttle response, PSM, PASM and Tiptronic shifting speeds.
Leading evidence: 'Adjust throttle response, psm, pasm and tiptronic shifting speeds' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust throttle response, psm, pasm and tiptronic shifting speeds' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I was under the impression that the body changes might be more radical.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
36 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
I went by to try and get a brochure on the 997 and after a few call, they told me that they were advised that the 997 may still not go into production.
Still too much like a Beetle in the front. And those turn signals are HUGE!!!
Otherwise looks really good. Not as good as a 996-facelift, but I'd own one,,,
Weissach - the 996 facelift I mean is the 02s+. The 997, while technically an upgrade, is much more than a facelift. It's differently proportioned, has an active suspension, a completely upgraded interior (which looks like crap to me), and the beetle lights.
I have a 99, and love it. But I like the 02s even better than mine, and better than the new 997s...
Is it me or do you think its just a variation in the basic 996, a little
widebodied and 993 lights? It must have something else to get buyers, maybe more HP than we have heard. Will
A price increase of $10K would help hold the value of 996's up, if they could actually get the higher price. Given the soft sales they've experienced lately (except for SUV's) I doubt it will happen.
My dealer has sold just about every 996 they can get their hands on. TT are all but gone according to them and they only had one 996, a C4S, on the lot today. I went by to try and get a brochure on the 997 and after a few call, they told me that they were advised that the 997 may still not go into production. Probably, bad information, but I thought it was interesting nonetheless.
The 19's look great as far as size is concerned, but the Gallardo techno influence will have to grow on me.
I don't dig the rear bumper line as it cuts across the beautiful rear quarter panel on each side. The 996 version of this line is much smoother IMO.
The side mirrors look great and the front end has a little 959 thrown in.
Quad pipes in the S look tough! Fewer fins in the decklid look nice, too.
It looks like Porsche went a little retro with the interior... is it me, or do I see some G35 in the steering wheel?
Interesting design... I need more time to soak it all up.
Cheers!
It's so hard to pass judgement from a photo. I remember seeing the 996 and really didn't like it. Then after a while and really looking and sitting in the car I was converted. I think my C4S is much, let me repeat, much more attractive than the pictures of the 997 I've seen so far. However, I'm still holding judgement until I can actually touch it, sit in it, drive it and experience it.
From the pictures I do agree about the head lamps... not a fan. The rear brake lights look too small, or somehow out of place. The quad pipes remind me too much of an M3 but they are fine either way.
I haven't seen enough pics of the interior, however, the Pepper steering wheel jumped out at me - not really in a good way.
But like I said I really need to experience the car before I can really come to any conclusion.
ATLANTA, GA, May 11, 2004 � Porsche� today disclosed the first information available on two all-new Porsche 911s destined to be the flagship models for its model year 2005 sports car lineup. The all-new Porsche 911 Carrera and more powerful 911 Carrera S combine the classic 911 silhouette, a trademark of the model for more than 40 years, with new and more aggressive styling.
Both models feature Porsche�s traditional horizontally opposed flat-six cylinder engines. The 911 Carrera�s 3.6-liter unit produces 325 HP (SAE) while the 911 Carrera S�s newly developed 3.8-liter power plant delivers 355 HP (SAE). Both cars also have a new six-speed gearbox and a reworked chassis, which includes active suspension as standard on the S model.
The new 911 models will go on sale in the second half of 2004. Manufacturer�s suggested retail price for the 911 Carrera is $69,300 US and $101,400 Canadian and for the 911 Carrera S $79,100 US and $115,650 Canadian.
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (PCNA), based in Atlanta, Ga., and its subsidiary, Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd., are the exclusive importers of Porsche sports cars and Cayenne sport utility vehicles for the United States and Canada. A wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of Dr. Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG, PCNA employs approximately 250 people who provide Porsche vehicles, parts, service, marketing and training for its 204 U.S. and Canadian dealers. They, in turn, provide Porsche owners with best-in-class service.
i'm confused. according to the info from porsche, the base 997 will go 0-60 in 5.0 seconds. that's .2 secs slower than a 996 carrera! and the 997 S will go 0-60 in 4.8 secs. what's going on here?!?!?! did they add that much weight to the new car?
Actually the stats from porsche for the 996 carrera is 5.0 sec.
We know it does this better in real life but they have weight added when doing tests to simulate the average weight for two people.
on their website they quote 0-62 mph as 5.0 secs with the manual, so that should be about 4.9 secs to 60 mph (ok, maybe almost 5.0
). so even if it's the same 0-60 times between the old and new car, i'm disappointed. i would have expected at least a .1 or .2 second gain.
i'm left asking:
WHERE'S OUR HP?!?!?!?!? it's at least a $75K car when you add the basic options. i know, i know "but a porsche is about handling too!". for that much money, you should get handling AND power...
The thing is that the "base" 911 has never really been a dragster when it comes to 0-60 times. More HP would be nice but if the car has the handling and durability that should exist in a Porsche I don't see a problem with it. Porsche have never been the value leader when it comes to 0-60 times or HP/per $$.
Riad, I could not agree more!
I am glad I bought my 2004 C4S.
The clock on top of the dash really has me puzzled, why would Porsche do this? IMHO, it looks tacky as hell
The clock "thingy" is an option- Chrono sport package plus. It can adjust, throttle response, PSM, PASM and Tiptronic shifting speeds. The timer in the dashboard monitors laptimes.
$79k for the 997 carrera "s" is actually not bad considering it took $75k to buy a similarly equipped 996 way back in '99--and the 997 appears to be superior on paper.
Carrera S with 355hp definitely sounds awesome. IMO the 3.8L 355hp should have been the basic motor for the 997. The "regular" carrera is basically the 996 motor under the heavier skin (makes no sense), should not even exist.(Isn't this increase of 5hp the lowest increase between any 911 model upgrades, heck less of an imporovement between the 01 996 and 02 996, which was 100% more)
So ideally in my perfect world the basic 997 with the 3.8L 355hp motor for a price in the low 70's would have been logical and ideal. (afterall the 996 which is out for 7 or 8 yrs. and 997 shares numerous componenets, and would it have killed porsche to give us the more powerful motor as the standard).
I think the quad pipes look like crap... big fat ovals or current dual ovals in a combined shape looks hot... no sex appeal on the tail pipes... I for one.. personally LIKE the front end... it's fresh and looks pretty clean.... the rims on the "S" are also hot.... the interior... argggg...
1999 996 Silver/Boxster Red
PSE/Aluminum package
forget it!! and this is coming from a guy who was thinking to go backward in time to a 993.....i love my car a lot more today.
that humpty-dumpty rear end and cheapo interior will do lots for my little ol' 99c2.
just my .02
I am relieved. I was under the impression that the body changes might be more radical. The 997 looks like a 996 facelift and may not be as detrimental to 996 resale as I previously thought. The wheels will be a pain in the washmitt to keep clean. Otherwise the body looks good and lets the 993 guys feel like they were back home with the 997 headlight treatment.
I believe that that is the main reason. It is a marketing tactic. The 996 owners cars are still relatively new, while the 993's are getting up there in age. The 993 owners will feel vindicated from the 996 "betrayal" and more likely to buy the 997.
Sort of dissapointing. Looks kind of like the 996 to me. Any increase in HP would be nice. Honestly though I would prefer ROW suspension and some weight loss (150lbs or so).
The Carrera has never been a drag car for me.. all about handling... on the track I would take the weight savings... changes so much more than just power...
JMHO..
I'll wait to see the 998 (or whatever they call it)
Be well folks...
Speed Yellow in Texas <----------------
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.