21 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHdoes anyone else here like the u.s. amber side markers?
Leading reported evidence
Use any tools
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
does anyone else here like the u.s. amber side markers?
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use any tools' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use any tools' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
does anyone else here like the u.s. amber side markers?
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T074343Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I do not change a car apperance - I'm of the strict school of product authenticity. I'm also leary about performance mods - unless they are strictly sanctioned by the manufacturer.
I prefer the orange side markes with Guard's Red. On a white or silver car I like the clear ones.
ADIAS - The clear side markers are a standard Porsche part.
I think I may have asked this before, but are there ambers, clears and smokeys? I wan't to get "clears" but I think when people say clear sidemarkers, somtetimes they mean "clear" and sometimes they mean "smokey"
I switched to clear on my Guards Red C2. The lenses go with the reverse light lenses in the rear. There is still an amber bulb and they look cooler at night. They are so easy to change. I didn't need to use any tools. You may as well change them as you desire.
on the C4S, I did not like the orange light next to the red brakes, so Iwent to clear side lights
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/s...ighlight=zaino
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
