10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2001 rebuildable for 20K
Leading reported evidence
Use 1987
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use 1987' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 1987' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello All,
I have an opportunity to purchase a 2001 996 with damage to the front left quarter area. The impact was behind the wheel and in front of the door jamb.
The impact seemed to be hard enough to move the steering column to the left and exposing portions of the firewall.
It has 53K miles, technic package, aerokit, aftermarket rims, no damage to motor/trans. needs front clip,
Interior needs center console, passgr side airbag, and some cosmetic parts.
Any information would be appreciated
I would be wary of rebuilable cars. If the insurance company decides it would cost more to fix the car than to buy total it, that means there is a lot of damage you can and cannot see. Additionally, you will have to go to a second rate shop to keep the costs down. Ask this question. It is in the insurers best interest to pay the least amount of money. If they could have fixed the car to safe STANDARDS they would have. How are you going to get the car to the same standards for less? Maybe I'm wrong but I'd stay away from it.
Bobby
I don't know about your own age or physical condition but, unless you are a Porsche mechanic who also knows body work pretty well, this is a good opportunity to figure out how fast you can run ... the other way. J
That's a good car for a Porsche mechanic that can work on it for a hobby... I would not buy a car with that damage in the hopes of repairing it. 20K is still a lot of money and you would need to put at least 15K into it from what you've described.
Hey Aben,
I was faced with a similar situation and here's what I decided.
My dad is a dealer and rebuilds wrecks for a hobby/retirement income. I've owned 4-5 of them over the last 15 years and never really had any problems that new (non-wrecked) cars don't have..and I paid a helluva lot less for them. Generally 50% of new cost for a car ~12 months old. Kinda gives you the warm fuzzies!
Honestly it's a great way to get an inexpensive daily driver if you have reasonable expectations (i.e., a common model, not hit hard, location of hit, not a nit-picker for details, etc.)
Having said all that, when I decided to buy a 996 I discussed it with him and we came to the same conclusion...don't bother with rebuilding one.
Reasons?
- high parts cost (do some pricing on those parts you think it needs but an airbag and cover alone will probably be ~1$k)
- more limited selection of wrecks to choose from (mileage, dmg location, etc.)
- salvage title (not a big deal on a $8k camry but this is going to be a $35k+ carrera by the time you're done...resale will be very difficult as people buying a Porsche at that price have diff stds.)
- end of the day savings as a % off used just wasn't worth the hassle (what're you gonna save vs. an avg condition used car? $5-8k maybe?)
For me the positives just didn't overcome the negatives but maybe your requirements are different.
For what it's worth I think the salvage car prices have been driven through the roof the last couple of years and there aren't many bargains out there like there used to be.
In the end I bought a used 99 with low miles in very good condition. Is it perfect? no but if I want to sell or trade up in the next couple of years it's a lot easier to gauge market value than with a car with a salvage title.
I'm not saying don't do it but go into it with your eyes open.
Good luck,
Keith
All,
Thanx for your opinions.
I decided to call them back and let the next buyer have a shot at it.
Apparently allot of interested parties have been calling up wanting to purchase the car.
Thanx again
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.