Rennlist

new rms install procedure has any body had a failer no a 3/03 march or later 996

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHnew rms install procedure has any body had a failer no a 3/03 march or later 996

Leading reported evidence

Test tool and measurment criteria decide whether the dealer is

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
In March 2003 a new procedure was released for the workshop manual and at the same time a new testing tool and measurment criteria decide whether the dealer is to even attampt a seal replacement or order a new engine.
Original post Read captured discussion
new rms install procedure has any body had a failer no a 3/03 march or later 996

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test tool and measurment criteria decide whether the dealer is' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test tool and measurment criteria decide whether the dealer is' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test tool and measurment criteria decide whether the dealer is

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
In March 2003 a new procedure was released for the workshop manual and at the same time a new testing tool and measurment criteria decide whether the dealer is to even attampt a seal replacement or order a new engine.
Original post Read captured discussion
new rms install procedure has any body had a failer no a 3/03 march or later 996

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T033922Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

My dealer told me the factory changed the install of the rms in march they pushed it deeper in the block. They said this was a fix. Is it true? thanks carl

POST 2Original post

Hope your right. Mines going in on the 21st for its 2nd RMS in 11 weeks!

POST 3Original post

There was a new design sealing ring in March 2000. In August 2002 there were new installation tools. In March 2003 a new procedure was released for the workshop manual and at the same time a new testing tool and measurment criteria decide whether the dealer is to even attampt a seal replacement or order a new engine. More than you wanted to know?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.