14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnyone use the Aero frnt bumper "boomerang"?
Leading reported evidence
Repair much easier than the bumper
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
the lip can be repaired much easier than the bumper.
Leading evidence: 'Repair much easier than the bumper' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair much easier than the bumper' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Are you using the protection plate for the engine?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am currently looking to purchase a GT3 aero front bumper. I understand that it's recommended to buy the plastic lip to protect the lower portion of the bumper.
I've heard you can also purchase an optional "boomerang" device to protect the bottom of the front bumper. Is anyone familiar with this boomerang part? I've seen one other post on this in the archives, but I've never heard from someone ever installing it on their 996 yet. Does it really help if you bottom out on a driveway or dip? Do I have to buy it from a dealer?
Thank you for any comments...
Steve
996garage,
Get the plastic lip, it is of great importance and will affect the aerodynamics of the car more that you can ever imagine that such a small piece of plastic could do.
It is actually not adviceable to fit the GT3 front bumper without compensating the downforce towards the rear.
Ciao,
Johannes E.
definitely get the plastic lip, costs less than $80. besides aforementioned aerodynamic benefits it also saves you from scratching front end. the lip can be repaired much easier than the bumper. it also improves the appearance.
As for the boomerang, I have never seen one being sold for the aerokit bumper, the one you have probably seen on ebay or performance products or these types of stores only fits regular bumper. Although I am sure some people have had them custom made I have never seen one for sale. still you can get the protection plate for the engine to help you if you bottom out.
raffi
Raffi,
Are you using the protection plate for the engine? I've lowered my 996 about an inch, so I was a little concerned about incurring damage to the underside of the engine.
I am not using a protection plate on my car as it is not lowered, I have no problems with bottoming out. I have seen alot of people with lowered cars use and recommend it, they are cheap so might as well pick one up if you are worried. Occasionally I will scrape the black spoiler lip under the aero bumper when I hurry out of parking lots. It is very durable though and does not show damage if you decide to leave it unpainted.
Hi guys,
Im pretty sure the thread starter was referring to the flat metal boomerang shaped piece that bolts under the front bumper and not the boomerang style wing(tail) that goes on the gt3 decklid. here is the boomerang at performance products.
http://performanceproducts.com/Produ...20&partnumber=
Kirby, with all the wind tunnel testing and research done there has to be alot of aerodynamic importance to having the rear wing, but if that is the case, why didnt porsche install a wing to go along with the new turbo style front bumper on the 40th anniversary. I really like the wing that would go with your car though. I have the older style aerokit and opted to not add the rear wing. I do not track the car and have never encountered any instability at 90-100mph. too scared to go anywhere near 120 after my license was suspended for going 102.
Raffi, re: the 40th anniv car, you'll notice that the lower lip of the front spoiler is raised in the middle, just like the C4s, another car without a fixed rear spoiler. This was done to compensate for the lack of rear downforce compared to the turbo.
net: the 40th car appears to be balanced f&r just like the rest of the cars.
996 505 986 00 spoiler
999 507 427 40 plastic screw rivets, you need 11 around 35 cents each
$22 is an excellent price, it must be a mistake. Prieviously the lowest I have seen them purchased for was $50, suncoast was $75 last year. I payed $100 a few months ago since it was on backorder at all dealerships and had no choice.
thanks for the info stiles, I had noticed the spoiler lip was different on the c4s and 40th compared to the turbo. I didnt realize that small piece made such a difference. So now, do you think since I dont have the wing on my c4 coupe that I am prone to instability due to the addition of the spoiler lip and further downforce? So maybe the answer to the initial question in this thread is that if you dont have the rear wing that it is better to not add the spoiler lip to the gt3 bumper?
thanks,
Raffi
Hi Raffi, yes that was the metal boomerang that I was referring to. Based upon the picture you posted to Performance Products web site, it looks like it may only be for the stock bumper. I seem to recall "By Design" automotive saying that it could fit on the GT3 front aero bumper as well, but the guy I was talking to there was more of a 993 expert vs. the 996.
I do plan on eventually adding a rear spoiler, but I'm not sure which one just yet.
Raffi, I'm not an expert on how the front lip is going to affect stability. It's obviously going to shift downforce towards the front as speeds rise (relative to the rear). This is opposite to the direction Porsche wants downforce trending as speeds rise (see the book "911 story" by Frere for some interesting data on this).
IMHO, it makes sense to do F&R as a matched set if you want to preserve high speed handling.
Thanks Stiles,
I am not too worried about stability as I do not drive high speeds too often. I was just concerned because I might be selling my car to a friend and want to tell him any possible dangers and to possibly advise him to add a wing.
Raffi
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.