12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHas RMS and Cam cover leaks been solved?
Reported or suspected cause
dozen or
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
A total over a month of probably a dozen or so drops, and that translated into a new engine this week.
Leading evidence: 'dozen or' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'dozen or' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
and once you get it fixed....it may go again, and again, and again.
I had a 2002 C2 at 8000 miles there was a cam covers seal leak which the dealer fixed. At 10000 miles there is a RMS leak. Does anyone know if Porsche corrected these problems in the 2003 and 2004 model? Welcome any input.
Hi,
the factory tells me it's been fixed, the RMS problem with a new type PTFE-seal and the cam cover problem with a different sealant and different o-rings.
I would hope they got the cam covers sealed. As for the RMS, I wouldn't bet the farm on it, because it's partly got to do with the way the crankshaft runs in a spherical graphite cast iron case which in turn sits in the aluminium crank case which houses the RMS. Aluminium and cast iron have different thermal expansion coefficients, so if the engine warms up, they can move relative to each other. Then the crank shaft and RMS are not aligned any more and you've got your oil leak.
Cheers,
uwe
RMS leak equals a few large (quarter size) drop marks on the garage floor, at least in my case. A total over a month of probably a dozen or so drops, and that translated into a new engine this week.
Bob
In my case it was 8-10 quarter size drops over a week or so. I'm not 100% sure of the week part, because I didn't notice it until there was already 7-8 drops.
No, the GT3, GT2, and Turbo motors are all based on the 964/993 crankcase. The M96 motor in the NA 996 is a different breed.
I had several quarter sized drops on my garage floor before my RMS was diagnosed as well.
Don't count on it being fixed in the newer 996s, I've heard of several MY03s with RMS leaks.
and once you get it fixed....it may go again, and again, and again.
I just had mine done 6 weeks back and it's gone again.
You may get a new engine. Sounds good. But what makes you think
the RMS won't go on the new engine. In fact it's almost a cert!
I guess we just all have to live up to this fact on the M96 engine.
I have learned to think of it like a clutch. It will go eventually and I will
have to pay for it.
I heard awhile back that Porsche determined it was in the basic design of the 9X6 Boxster/996 engine . They have updated the seals a few times w/o it working as a permanent fix. They realize it isn't fixable on current engine, but it's cheaper to keep replacing with redesigned seals vs redesigning the engine - you know - the " we are a small company, limited engineering resources due to the Cayenne/Cerrera GT development " line we've heard for a while. That's why a problem that showed up on Boxsters in 1998 still exists on '03 996s , 6-7 model years later . Someone at my dealership service jokes it's the Porsche- mechanic full employment act.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.