18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHneed some help identifying rear wing.
Leading reported evidence
Set (all separate lights and not
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think the original owner had some aftermarket stuff done as my front and rear bumpers are definitely not factory (particularly the rear), and I have a different headlight set (all separate lights and not under the single pane of glass and with a black bordering the size of the glass).
Leading evidence: 'Set (all separate lights and not' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set (all separate lights and not' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Set (all separate lights and not
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think the original owner had some aftermarket stuff done as my front and rear bumpers are definitely not factory (particularly the rear), and I have a different headlight set (all separate lights and not under the single pane of glass and with a black bordering the size of the glass).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
can someone help me identify the rear wing that is on my car? several searches have not turned up much :/ Many thanks for the help. Also, pay no attn to the socks and sandels.
OKJ9rs2.jpg
5hD8NxU.jpg
zp4Cq72.jpg
Looks like the factory aero rear wing. It came on both coupes and convertibles but were specifically more popular on verts since you couldn't fit the other aero style(gt3) wing on them.
Look under the deck lid for any imprinted writing and Mobil1 sticker to see if its OEM.
Yes. Its the factory aero wing. I am fortunate enough to have the same on my black 2003 C2 (acquired last year). I think the original owner had some aftermarket stuff done as my front and rear bumpers are definitely not factory (particularly the rear), and I have a different headlight set (all separate lights and not under the single pane of glass and with a black bordering the size of the glass). Love your rims too...I have the factory silver ones. Might be one of my next mods (to get different rims). Beautiful car you have...
Why would a cab Aero wing be on a coupe? Were the side skirts and wing added? What does the option code sticker say? I don't think when the car was built there was an option for either wing. The taco came with the coupe.
Love your car. Is the Carrera emblem on your car black or silver? It looks black but hard to tell. My black 911 has been debadged and I'm trying to decide on a Carrera emblem or just the 911 emblem. I'd like black but I don't know if you would be able to see it.
Doesn't look like the OE to me [see pix below].
The OE Turbo Aerokit was $7980 and includes the front splitter.
It would be on the under hood sticker as XAF.
The part number is very difficult to read, but I think it is 996 512 991 00.
I really appreciate all the info. Been traveling so it took me a while to get back here. All this stuff was on the car when I got about a month ago. I am trying to figure out what is oem and what is aftermarket... Thanks for all the help.
Believe it or not, I actually set that shot up on purpose to send to my sister; she hates socks and sandals with a passion! So I set up pictures with them to mess with her. She gets embarrassed just looking at the pics, it funny as hell.
I say yes, lets make this a thing!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
