7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIdentify this part/leak, pic inside.
Leading reported evidence
Clean block and it seems
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I cleaned the block and it seems that is the highest point where the leak can be coming from.
Leading evidence: 'Clean block and it seems' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check back in' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Thanks for all the information and I will check back in!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I don't have any experience with boosted m96 motors but it doesn't sound out of the question to have a small oil leak from there when running boost if no other mods were made to the crankcase venting system.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I don't have any experience with boosted m96 motors but it doesn't sound out of the question to have a small oil leak from there when running boost if no other mods were made to the crankcase venting system.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey guys,
So far the car is going well, I took it apart to identify a leak and address some other issues.
First one, there seems to be a leak coming from this hose area that I seem unable to identify. perhaps it is a breather of some sort?
It is a black line, that has an open nipple above the head below the ac condenser, and it is behind the big coolant line in the engine.
i know thats not an m96 but its the same thing there.
Seems to be leak where it attaches to the head just under the ac condenser.
Thoughts? I cleaned the block and it seems that is the highest point where the leak can be coming from.
In addition to that, is there a good place to increase crankcase ventilation? Any ideas on how to do this? My boost is causing my dipstick to pop out and spray oil inside my bay occassionally.
The engine in the picture is a cayman or boxster engine so the setup is a bit different than for a 911 but the red arrow in the picture is pointing to a vacuum line that comes off the mechanical vacuum pump. On a 997 there is a metal pipe that comes off the pump and goes the brake booster. If you have oil in that line the vacuum pump has failed and is sucking engine oil. There should be no oil in that line whatsoever. Im a bit confused why you posted a picture of a 9x7 cayman or boxster engine in the 996 forum?
thats not my motor, its a pic of a motor with the same part i was looking for. Mine obviously looks similar and I appreciate you guys addressing a potential mistake.
I have an M96 but that same piece seems to be coated in oil. Perhaps the leak is coming from further back in the engine? I will take a closer look tonight when I get a chance to work on the car.
Thanks for all the information and I will check back in!
Holy ****, did you guys even read the post? It clearly says he knows it's not an M96 in the picture, but it was obviously the only picture he could find that showed the part he was inquiring about, which obviously appears on more than one engine in the Porsche family.
For this one, there are a few possible sources of the issue.
1) Blow-by in the cylinders, which would be bad rings. This is your worst-case scenario
2) More likely, you need to trace the intake piping from the turbo to the intake manifolds and see if you have any vacuum lines that lead to the crankcase that don't have a check valve on them (or a broken check valve). This would give the manifold pressure a route to the crankcase, which could pressurize it, and also result in some performance loss since it would also throw off your A/F ratios a bit.
That part that the arrow in his picture is pointing to does not appear on ANY M96 motor. The mechanical vacuum pump was not used until M97 engines. This is why I'm confused. OP needs to take an actual picture of his engine if he wants any help because there's no possible way his car has that part.
I admit I didn't see that his car was supercharged/turbocharged. What he is probably meaning to show is the crankcase overpressure valve. This is installed on m96 engines at the top of the bank 2 cylinder head. I don't have any experience with boosted m96 motors but it doesn't sound out of the question to have a small oil leak from there when running boost if no other mods were made to the crankcase venting system. What supercharger/turbo setup is on the engine? I would imagine the big name systems like from evolution have some way of addressing this.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.