fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

X74 Alignment Recommendations

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHX74 Alignment Recommendations

Leading reported evidence

Set rear at -1.5 degrees

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you can't get -1 in the front I'd still set the rear at -1.5 degrees.

Original post Read captured discussion
X74 Alignment Recommendations
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Set rear at -1.5 degrees' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set rear at -1.5 degrees' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Set rear at -1.5 degrees

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you can't get -1 in the front I'd still set the rear at -1.5 degrees.

Original post Read captured discussion
X74 Alignment Recommendations
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

For a 2003 C2 Coupe. I have a question for those of you who have the X74 suspension. I drive on the street all year and do 2-4 DEs and autocrosses each season: What would be your recommendation for front and rear camber? Factory camber settings are: F -30' R -1 deg 40' I am thinking: F -1 deg R -2 deg Apart from tire wear, what other negatives?

POST 2Original post

I'd go as negative as you possibly can in the front with very little or zero toe-in at the front. Then go ~.5 more negative camber in the rear than in the front. Rear toe is a whole other debate. I like quite a bit to combat bump steer under load. Others don't like as much. Andy **edit**. If you can't get -1 in the front I'd still set the rear at -1.5 degrees. Kinda breaks my rule of .5 degree more in the rear but you really don't want any less negative camber than that in the rear.

POST 3Original post

What he said. I have same setup, same car as you. Go max neg camber up front, then -0.5 degree more negative in back, or -1.5, whichever is greater. I was only able to get -0.4 up front.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.