7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHEscort S2 Opinions?
Leading reported evidence
Use valentine
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
On a recent roadtrip across Nevada, I used a Valentine which worked great.
Leading evidence: 'Use valentine' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test sites' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Take a look at these sites and go to the escort site, they have many links to the magazine test sites.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Sorry if offtopic, but I'm sure there are many experts out there and interested readers!!
Does anyone have experience with the Escort S2? Is it any good, worth about $330?
On a recent roadtrip across Nevada, I used a Valentine which worked great. But I would really love CORDLESS...no mess, no fuss!
Lots of V1 fans on this site so get ready for the why would you by an escort comments:-)
The Solo S2 is a great looking detector and much better than the earlier Solo model.
The problem: Cordless models lack the distance of corded models for the same reason a car phone gets better reception than a hand held mobile phone -- POWER SUPPLY.
I talked to Escort a few days ago. One sales person said 25% less distance, the other said 50%. I belive it depends on the typeof signal band. Either way, that is a big trade off to simply lose the cord.
Most of the radar tests were done in 2001. Take a look at these sites and go to the escort site, they have many links to the magazine test sites.
<a href="http://www.radartest.com" target="_blank">www.radartest.com</a>
<a href="http://www.speedzones.com" target="_blank">www.speedzones.com</a>
<a href="http://www.laserbusters.com" target="_blank">www.laserbusters.com</a>
If anyone knows, I would like to know when the Passport 8500 will be upgraded.
Don't know about the S2, but the 8500 is excellent. I bought it because it is simplicity over the V1. The fewer lights and controls the better IMO. The thing is incredibly sensitive, way more than necessary really for me. Re the S2, having to turn the thing on every time would be a pain. No thanks.
I too would like to know when the 8500 will be upgraded - From the dates of the reviews, I think it was late '00 - isn't that incredibly old for a computer-type of device? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
Not quite the same subject but I wonder why the V1 was never "modernized" from an aesthetic point of view. Certainly there have been electronic improvements, but they look the same as they did years ago. I have one and love it, but they look really old fashioned
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
