fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHDyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day

Leading reported evidence

Run car

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I ran my car on the dyno yesterday, and netted 248.3HP at the wheels, and 316.2 at the crank.

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day
Frequently discussed work

Run back

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

The dyno has built in software that interpolated your run back to the crank using proprietary technology.

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run back' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Run back

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

The dyno has built in software that interpolated your run back to the crank using proprietary technology.

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day

Use proprietary technology

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

The dyno has built in software that interpolated your run back to the crank using proprietary technology.

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run back

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

The dyno has built in software that interpolated your run back to the crank using proprietary technology.

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day

Run car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I ran my car on the dyno yesterday, and netted 248.3HP at the wheels, and 316.2 at the crank.

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day

Use proprietary technology

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

The dyno has built in software that interpolated your run back to the crank using proprietary technology.

Dyno results from PCA Sarasota dyno day
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T022239Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I ran my car on the dyno yesterday, and netted 248.3HP at the wheels, and 316.2 at the crank. The HP peak was right at redline, with a large spike at 5k and a smaller one at 6k. The dyno was a Dyno Dynamics, so I don't know how the results compare to the typical dynojet. Anyone know? Andy

POST 2Original post

Which model/engine? How did they calculate the crank hp?

POST 3Original post

The calcuolation implies 21.5% power loss thru the drivetrain. Does anyone know if that's correct? If rw hp is 248 and drivetrain losses are 20%, then engine hp calculates to 310. I'm not sure it matters since what you learned is your baseline for measuring benefit gained from future mods (on the same dyno).AS

POST 4Original post

No, 21.5 is excessive even w/ Dyno Dynamics. 911 driveline loss is more like 12%, might be 15% at the high. A tip car will come in at 15% mostly. Your 248.3 divided by .85 (15% loss) = 292.11 FWIW, we just dynoed a pal of mines 1999 C2 and got 261 @ the wheels on a Dyno Jet (his car has an air intake mod & ImagineAuto.com mufflers). For comparison I have my dyno sheet right here on my 1995 993: 241.7 @ the wheels. Just muffler mods on it. At 292 crank your just about right on target.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It's the 3.6/320HP engine with the 6 speed. A '02 3.6 Tip put down 220 at the wheels, and mine only has a couple thousand miles, so I'm hoping for a couple more horses as it loosens up. Now that I think about it, the 964 manuals were only putting down about 170HP at the wheels, so I think the dyno is pretty conservative. The dyno has built in software that interpolated your run back to the crank using proprietary technology. It said 316.2 at the crank, so it's pretty close.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.