20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMarket is nuts?
Leading reported evidence
Repair done
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Good catch, might have snapped since the indents are seen..unless there was some repair done.
Leading evidence: 'Repair done' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair done' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T042512Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Here's a ridiculously low mileage 2004 cab on eBay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cabri...#ht_688wt_1182
High bid was $49,125 but the reserve was not met so it did not sell. KBB says private party sale in excellent condition would be $47,522.
Price is opinion not fact. Everyone is entitled to his opinion.
Cabs are considered quite worth the premium (well, sometimes) by their first owners. Subsequent owners not so much. Sometimes it is hard for the original owner to accept his car may have depreciated a lot more than he had expected and might have been led to believe.
The dude gave himself a 911 for his 50th birthday and then proceeded to drive it, on average, 343.77 miles a year. Assuming he paid $80K for it new, it cost him nearly $26 a mile to own. Even if he gets the reserve price (I'm assuming) of $50K, it
still
cost him $9.70 a mile to own that car.
It boggles my mind that this guy burned $30,000 to drive 350 miles a year an a car that isn't all that exceptional (by this, I mean it's a silver 996 cab, which is the most common 996).
I know that some people love the ownership experience more than the driving experience - but I'm not one of those. It's completely foreign to me...
Real low mileage, throws a big red flag up in my eyes. The car may look excellent but it has stood around for years. I would not touch it at any price when there are others out there for much less money with a feasible mileage for the year. I say bollux to him at that price or any price. That's OIMHO however.
There's often a large gulf between what people think their cars are worth and what people are actually willing to pay for them. (Case in point: hilariously optimistic for-sale ads in Excellence) Add to that the difficulty of buyers finding the "right" car and the difficulty of sellers finding the right buyer, and you end up with a ton of market variation.
Anyone else notice the missing hose clamp in this pic? Did they forget this from the factory? I noticed mine was missing after investigating a SAI CEL.
There were two shill bidders in this auction....they tried to drive bidding close to the reserve and get some newbie to get excited and jump in at the end....prices aren't crazy with water cooled yet.....see 964, 993s for some crazy numbers
There is no clamp on either my 04 C2 or my 04 C4S with a new Porsche crate motor. My first thought when I noticed it on the C2 was that it was missing, but then when I checked the C4S I thought it must be by design, and now you have me wondering again.
Mine didn't have one either. Theres not enough pressure on this hose from the air pump to blow it off so its fine. My OCD required that I install a clamp anyway.
