13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHYour opinion is needed!
Reported or suspected cause
latest year
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'latest year' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'latest year' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T103553Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm thinking of selling my 03 996 in order to purchase a Turbo one.
I'm your opinion which 911 Turbo s faster
Between the year models 99 thru 05
TIA
G'
05 Turbo S is fastest, but you can find earlier years with X50 (option code) that is same as 05 Turbo S. An 05 Turbo S adds PCCB. Some 04s that was an option.
Then there are GT2s...different beast and rare. As fast as Turbo S. Lighter weight might make it quicker.
What exactly do you want to know. Hit 996 turbo board.
You're splitting hairs here...
They are all fast. They are all powered by the same engine. In your price range, you might be able to find a 2001 or 2002 with the X50 package. That's probably your best bet.
At the point you've decided on a turbo, spend less time agonizing about a specific year and instead focus on condition, mileage, maintenance, etc.
Refusing to consider an '03 or '04 solely because of the model year might lead you to the wrong car. A quarter-second difference in 0-60 time isn't going to be worth as much to you as peace of mind knowing you bought the car you should have.
Look on EBay Motors. You will find one meeting those criteria. Actually, you will find more than one. There was just a one-owner TT for sale near me for $35K. Looked like a beauty. The listing expired last week. Maybe you can still contact the owner.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/996-/...orcev4exp=true
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
