Rennlist

ROW M030 upgrade

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHROW M030 upgrade

Leading reported evidence

Recommend more extreme (esp

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Does anybody recommend more extreme (esp.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Recommend more extreme (esp' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend more extreme (esp' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Run close

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
These alignment settings seem like they would tend toward understeer - but I'm coming from a 993 perspective and running close to -2deg all round for a street / heavy track use vehicle.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Run street and track

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
If you are running street and track then -1.5 degrees is likely going to cause more aggressive tire wear than you may want.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Use vehicle

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
These alignment settings seem like they would tend toward understeer - but I'm coming from a 993 perspective and running close to -2deg all round for a street / heavy track use vehicle.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Frequently discussed actions (4)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Recommend more extreme (esp

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Does anybody recommend more extreme (esp.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Run close

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
These alignment settings seem like they would tend toward understeer - but I'm coming from a 993 perspective and running close to -2deg all round for a street / heavy track use vehicle.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Run street and track

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
If you are running street and track then -1.5 degrees is likely going to cause more aggressive tire wear than you may want.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Use vehicle

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
These alignment settings seem like they would tend toward understeer - but I'm coming from a 993 perspective and running close to -2deg all round for a street / heavy track use vehicle.
Original post Read captured discussion
ROW M030 upgrade

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I am upgrading to the ROW sport suspension. What are the best alighnment specs for a street/track car. Mostly street.

POST 2Original post

From the Porsche Technical Manual... ROW M030 Sport Conditions: Full fuel, spare wheel and tools, no driver or additional weights Front Toe unpressed (total): + 5 min +-5 min Toe difference angle (at 20 degrees lock): - 2 deg 20 min +-30 min Camber: - 15 min +- 15 min Caster: 8 deg +- 30 min Rear Toe (per wheel): + 5 min +- 5 min Camber: -1 deg 25 min +- 15 min If you have PSM don't forget the steering angle sensor must be checked and re-calibrated with suspension changes.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the info.

POST 4Original post

These alignment settings seem like they would tend toward understeer - but I'm coming from a 993 perspective and running close to -2deg all round for a street / heavy track use vehicle. Does anybody recommend more extreme (esp. in front) camber setup for the 996 ?

POST 5Original post

What I posted are the factory specs for ROW M030 suspensions. Of course you could run a negative 1.5 degrees in the front and most track only cars do. If you are running street and track then -1.5 degrees is likely going to cause more aggressive tire wear than you may want.

POST 6Original post

Chris, I have -2 degrees of camber front & back on my 99 C2. It handles great both on and off the track. Camber adjustment is very limited on the 996 though. I don't think you can get anywhere near -2 degrees with the ROW M030 suspension. As for wear on street tires, I just wear out the insides and then flip them on the rims. Track guys have been doing it for years and it's worked fine on my S02s.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.