7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThinking about a 996 Cab - any current advice?
Leading reported evidence
Replace (tops will last between 5
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Only issue I've had so far is the top which had to be replaced (tops will last between 5 to 7 years here in the South).
Leading evidence: 'Replace (tops will last between 5' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check warranty and service history' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Checking the warranty and service history on the car would give you insight to the history of car.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The 'plastic' rear window tends to disconnect from the canvas.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi there - coming in from the 928 forums
I have 2 928 S4's and a Mazda Miata, and am thinking about reducing the fleet since I am moving. I definitely want to have a drop top, and I am pretty passionate about Porsches, so I want to stay in the family rather than going to another marque.
I am not very familiar with the 996, hence the information request. In terms of wants, I would be looking for a mid-range price ($40-$60K) cabriolet with a 6 speed, which seems attainable. My question is more on user experience and reliability. The 928 is a cruiser, and the Miata is easy to throw around corners. I see the 996 as in the middle - more sporty than the 928, but better for just cruising along than the Miata. Is that a true statement?
On reliabiity, I have searched through this forum and it seems like some owners have great experiences with their 996, and others have had a host of issues. I like to do as much of my own wrenching as possible, but I have no experience with how difficult working on the 996 can be. This will not be a daily driver, but I would like it to be a frequent driver
Thoughts or comments on the reliability? Is is better to get as new as possible with a warranty and extend it?
Any thoughts or ideas are welcome!
Thanks!
Bill
Welcome!!
Although I own a 2000, you might want to consider the 2002+ since they have the glass rear window (and a few more hp). Other than that, all 996 Cabs are nice to me, especially the Turbo!
As for reliability, I've had a few niggly issues but nothing that would keep me from driving the car anytime/anywhere. Otherwise, my 2000 cab has been a joy to own.
Enjoy!
I've got an 03 Cab and absolutely love it. Your views compared to your other rides are spot on. In that price range, you can get a well equipped, low mileage CPO vehicle that is as good as new but without the huge depreciation hit.
Mine is a daily driver and I have just over one year of ownership with 15K miles that I've put on over the course of about 9 months (I travel a lot). No major problems or expenses other than the gas bill due to my heavy right foot. (I have gotten as high as 29 MPG on the highway).
I picked up a 2000 996 a year ago.
Daily driver. Great car.
Only issue I've had so far is the top which had to be replaced (tops will last between 5 to 7 years here in the South). The 'plastic' rear window tends to disconnect from the canvas. Major cost for a Porsche (> $3K).
Other than that, I guess you've heard of the RMS issues.
Just go for a decent PPI.
I own a 02. It's the best year since it's the only facelifted model without MOST optic fiber network for stereo. MOST will limit your ability to upgrade stereo. Given your budget, I'd go with an 02+.
Weak points in 996 cab are: RMS, rattles, coolant expansion tank, MAF failure. Checking the warranty and service history on the car would give you insight to the history of car. Gettting a PPI will tell you the mechanical condition of the car as is. Keep in mind that CPO does not cover as much as the original warranty. If you can afford a newer car with 1-2 yr of original warranty, it's better than buying one with CPO warranty.
Bill,
I'll keep an eye out for you in the Berg. You have a large price range and can certainly find a lot in there and in our area. I agree that an 02+ is a good option...I will not say the best because they are all good. You say that it would not be a daily driver but frequent driver. I assume that this is not for track purposes or you porably would not be going with a Cab. The reason I mention this is that it seems the mod bug affects almost 99% of 996 owners. The cars are great out of the box but there are just so many goodies out there and they are hard to resist. I would just keep this in mind on the purchase. Think about the things that you want and then look for the car that has them or save that aside so you can do it yourself. Good luck and maybe I'll see you in town.
I second Joe's opinion. I too bought a moderately low mileage 2000 and do love it, but I could have afforded to go 2002. If I could do it over again, I would go newer. You can definitely get a 2002+ if you're willing to go up to 60k, and you should be able to get a Certified Pre Owned car, which I would personally recommend. If you see a car you like, don't hesitate to post the asking price here and you should get some quick replies about fair pricing. Enjoy the search!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.