12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDurametric question
Leading reported evidence
Replace with it
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace with it' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace with it' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Attached is a screenshot I just took of the readout which definitely allows you to view and reset the airbag.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Hi Pete, although I have not used it (enthusiast version) to reset the airbag light, I'm pretty sure it can.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm looking at the "Enthusiast" package vs the "Pro". Question I have is will the "Enthusiast" turn off airbag lights and others? Their site says the main diff between the two is that the "Pro" is unlimited car usage and can enable/disable airbags and spoilers and some other gizmos. The enable/disable comment make me think about the airbag and the "Enthusiast" won't turn off the airbag light.
Needs some insight. Thanks
if you still have windows XP and do not mind a knock-off:
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...ock-off-4.html
P.S. I do not have 1st hand experience with this product
Hi Pete, although I have not used it (enthusiast version) to reset the airbag light, I'm pretty sure it can. Same is listed under "product overview" on their website. The part that you quoted most likely refers to programming functions where a device can be enabled/disabled, nothing to do with errors of a device.
Hi all - I just bought my Durametric Enthusiast version last week. It has all the same features as the professional version but is limited to a few VINs only.
Attached is a screenshot I just took of the readout which definitely allows you to view and reset the airbag.
I have a 2003 996 C4S, FYI.
Cheers!
Hi Sneaky Pete,
The enthousiast package is limited to 3 VIN's. I opted for the pro version as I already have two P cars. You may want to look at the following link where there is more info.
http://www.renntech.org/forums/topic...ed-durametric/
Cheers.
It's a supper handy tool. I was able to diagnose a bad wheel speed sensor with it. I've also reset my airbag light several times (I've had the seat out a bit).
Hey Pete - I've been more active in the Racing and 944 forums lately... My 996 has been just so great, there's not much to talk about! It starts all the time, it's comfortable, it's always the prettiest car in the parking lot, driving home is frequently the highlight of my day, and has cost very little money to maintain (relative to the rest of my eclectic fleet).
I'll make a point to hang out here more.
