fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

2003, 24K mi or 2004, 41K mi?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
30 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH2003, 24K mi or 2004, 41K mi?

Leading reported evidence

Replace rubber if required

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Mine is a fair weather driver, so I wanted the best performing tires, not all season, ( and absolutely hated the brand new tires that the PO had blessed me with) but if yours is to be a daily driver then you have to have all seasons, so take in to account the cost of replacing the rubber if required when dealing.

2003, 24K mi or 2004, 41K mi?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace rubber if required' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace rubber if required' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 30 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use car

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

More important, for instance, than that is what tires they installed, and what you will use the car for.

2003, 24K mi or 2004, 41K mi?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace rubber if required

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Mine is a fair weather driver, so I wanted the best performing tires, not all season, ( and absolutely hated the brand new tires that the PO had blessed me with) but if yours is to be a daily driver then you have to have all seasons, so take in to account the cost of replacing the rubber if required when dealing.

2003, 24K mi or 2004, 41K mi?

Use car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

More important, for instance, than that is what tires they installed, and what you will use the car for.

2003, 24K mi or 2004, 41K mi?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

30 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Gonna buy a 996 and have settled on two choices. A 2003 with 24500 miles or a 2004 with 41400 miles. I've negotiated a deal on the 2003, and plan to look it over Tuesday, Nov 20, 2012. I'm seriously considering the 2004 despite a long round trip to get it? Informed opinions are welcome. 2003 http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-s...es=%5BCOUPE%5D 2004 http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-s...es=%5BCOUPE%5D

POST 3Original post

Quotes source post: 10008962

I'd go with the 2004 just for the tan interior as well.

POST 4Original post

I also like the color combo of the 2004 better. If you really like both of them then get a PPI on both before you decide. But get a PPI either way at an Indy. Do they have maintenance history on them?

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10008982

None on the blue 2003. Don't know on the 2004.

POST 6Original post

neither Sorry, there's nothing that excites me about either car. Look long and hard, wait 'till one comes around that will knock your socks off. You won't have to ask, "which one?" you will know it will be the car you must have.

POST 7Original post

Between these two cars I'd opt for the 2004 - they always say to go for the latest year of the series PLUS the listing says the 2004 has PSE (Porsche Sport Exhaust). I have PSE on both of mine and can't imagine having one with out it. Color schemes are subjective - I wouldn't buy a car just because of color - more about which is the better car and only you can try to determine that. Plus I am not one to comment on the colors - my C2 is artic silver over black and the C4S is Midnight blue over grey. I like both of them.

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10009383

It's been a tough call. I like the low mileage of the 2003 and it's conveniently located. The silver 2004 has performance options I like but has ~17K more miles, and 508 miles away.

POST 9Original post

17K more mile is nothing. Unless you can go and see the '04 and see whay shape it is in, there is no point discussing it. Also, since you've already negotiated the price on the first one, why not go through with it. The buyer is probably not expecting you to walk away from it.

POST 10Original post

i'd say either one, but it sounds like you are leaning towards the 03 with lower miles.GL on your choice.

POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10009440

I've not seen either car. The 2003 deal is contingent on successful visual inspection to verify condition--which was tentatively planned for tomorrow. Meanwhile I'm looking into the silver 2004 via telephone.

POST 13Original post

I will play devils advocate and say that unless you actually drive each one, it's impossible to tell, and that is more important to me than color & interior, to an extent. Visually, I like the '04, and newer is always better and both have low miles ( and sometimes too low miles is not a good thing), but before I bought my '02 in '08, I drove around 6 of them, and they all drove so different (motor sound & feel, suspension noises, creaks, handling, etc) that some I just crossed off as soon as I drove them, regardless of the color combo. I lucked out with getting the combo I actually wanted with all the options I was looking for, (for instance I had to have PSM, and really wanted the Comfort and Technics package with the soft style leather seats), my car was only lacking PSE. Considering the PSE hack is so cheap and easy to do, and sounds exactly the same, and is actually longer lasting (as long as the bypass pipe is SS), I found PSE is a non deciding factor, now that I did mine. More important, for instance, than that is what tires they installed, and what you will use the car for. Mine is a fair weather driver, so I wanted the best performing tires, not all season, ( and absolutely hated the brand new tires that the PO had blessed me with) but if yours is to be a daily driver then you have to have all seasons, so take in to account the cost of replacing the rubber if required when dealing. Don't be in a hurry, just because you want one..there will always be more.

POST 14Original post

The question is impossible to answer without knowing options. For example, does either car have PSM, full leather, etc.? The 04 does not look like it has full leather. Not the heart of the decision, but an important aspect to consider when you get down to just two cars.

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10009937

The blue 2003 is a standard coupe with 18-inch wheels and heated seats. The silver 2004 has 18s, heated seats, sport suspension, sport exhaust, Bose sound system. The intake is modified.

POST 16Original post

Quotes source post: 10010056

Proving my point exactly about the importance of options. Those suspension and exhaust options are fairly rare on a base Carrera. Sport exhaust was a $2,400 option in 2004. Based on overall condition and PPI results, and depending on the intake mod quality, I would choose the 2004.

POST 17Original post

Quotes source post: 10009423

If your deciding factor is low mileage then you have not done enough research when it comes to purchasing these cars. Low mileage and no maintence records would cause me to stop looking at this car. Slightly higher mileage and no records would cause me to pass on that one too.

POST 18Original post

That 2004 does not seem to have any kind of special exhaust tips as listed in the ad, they look just like the ones on my '02 C2. Get the guy to send you all the option codes on the sticker under the the trunklid and make sure you look them up. Some dealers will write everything they can in the description, whether it's true or not. Compared to our Minivan, my C2 certainly has a "Sports Exhaust" but that does not mean it is the factory option Sports Exhaust...That being said, I find the standard exhaust from 02 on to be perfectly adequate and having a great sound...

POST 19Original post

Quotes source post: 10010411

Good advice. The ad for the 2004 says it has full leather, but the photos disagree.

POST 21Original post

Where's the links? I voted the silver car because I like silver and there's less chance that the interior is the colour of peanut butter. I like the sport suspension too....

POST 22 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10011845

2003 http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-s...es=%5BCOUPE%5D 2004 http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-s...es=%5BCOUPE%5D The 2004 has spotty history, and his been at several auctions. The equipment listed is under question. CarFax shows no record of routine maintenance performed. The Metroplex sales rep was slow in responding to requests for more information and was negative about my wanting photos of the undercarriage. Some of the claims he made could not have been confirmed by the few records that were available. The 2003 is completely stock, and its CarFax shows service records of routine maintenance performed, and other extra services (such as new tires, brake flushes, etc). The owner was responsive to all of my requests for additional info, disclosed all aspects of his car, and was reasonable during our negotiations.

POST 23 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10010407

Sadly I've spent far too much time researching Porsche 911s (10 years).

POST 24 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10009453

You've echoed the same response from my most trusted fellow Central Indiana Porsche Club members. Thank you.

POST 26Original post

Well, its a no brainer. The dodgy seller would be enough to make me walk. The silver on beige colour scheme would make me run.

POST 27Original post

Quotes source post: 10012374

Yeah, that color scheme is rough.

POST 28 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10012230

No.

POST 29Original post

bumper-to-bumper traffic here in SoCal (at its worst, might as well call some freeways a parking lot) = bad news for an air-cooled 911. Not sure how traffic is for you. Best of luck with your search. P.S. was all set to get a 993 years ago but an uncle (who has one) and local mechanic (who has a few) both suggested that I look into a 996 instead.

POST 30 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 10013052

I'm coming from an '88 Carrera DE car. 996es don't do it for me I guess? Thanks.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.