fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Heads up on motor mounts form Pelican

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
1 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHHeads up on motor mounts form Pelican

Leading reported evidence

Fill not solid rubber (no way

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

They assure me they are the same design, with fluid fill, not solid rubber (no way to tell, of course), and that they have never had any returned or failure reports.

Original post Read captured discussion
Heads up on motor mounts form Pelican
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Fill not solid rubber (no way' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill not solid rubber (no way' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 1 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill not solid rubber (no way

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

They assure me they are the same design, with fluid fill, not solid rubber (no way to tell, of course), and that they have never had any returned or failure reports.

Original post Read captured discussion
Heads up on motor mounts form Pelican
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

1 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Pelican has great prices on the OE replacement motor mounts, $91 each. They list both Carrera and Turbo (-08 and -09), and the manufacturer as Corteco on their web site. Most posts I'd read on them seemed positive, so I went with them, ordering the (-09), what I assumed would be the stiffer Turbo ones. I ended up getting ones with a "replacement for" regular Carrera ones (-08), made by Rein instead. I called Pelican Parts dept about them, and they assured me that Rein and Corteco are actually the exact same manufacturer, and that they only make one motor mount to the Turbo standard, but it has a "replacement for -08" sticker on the box and mount, and it is the only version that is available, and that they sell. They assure me they are the same design, with fluid fill, not solid rubber (no way to tell, of course), and that they have never had any returned or failure reports. I don't need any advice to buy RS ones, or real Porsche ones or WEVOs, I just wanted to make anyone interested aware of this, in case it sways their decision. I've decided to just go and stick with them and try them out. If they are crap, I'll just make a lot a noise and see what Pelican does...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.