15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHrms/ims leak?
Leading reported evidence
Replace before around 2003 i think
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
The previous owner had the ims and and rms seals replaced before around 2003 I think.
Leading evidence: 'Replace before around 2003 i think' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'those days are over' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check oil' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I suspect those days are over and that sort of a leak now requires immediate attention.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
i guess ill monitor the leak for now, and check the oil for particles.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
would pull the filter and oil as bypro suggests, make sure there are no ferro magnetic particles, clean the area, monitor and continue to drive the car.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
would pull the filter and oil as bypro suggests, make sure there are no ferro magnetic particles, clean the area, monitor and continue to drive the car.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Early on there were reports of just a handful of cases which had out of round crank bores and so no RMS would seal, the engines were replaced by Porsche.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T103553Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Old wisdom was that a leak like that was RMS and you could wait a while if you put up with the stains in the garage. A good dealer tech I know used to describe these sorts of leaks as "Porsche external rustproofing."
I suspect those days are over and that sort of a leak now requires immediate attention.
Seen pics that are a lot worse than that. If the car isn't using a ton of oil, I would just keep monitoring the oil and the severity of the leak.
You can clean the area and then monitor.
It's not that bad, but I would deal with it now. If your IMS is leaking, it's a good sign that the bearing seal is gone, and your bearing is going to be next. Use this opportunity to upgrade the bearing before engine damage occurs.
How long have you had the car? Was the RMS ever replaced by you or previous owners? Chances are it's the RMS rather than the IMS cover leaking (could be either/both, though). I've heard some cars have very minor clearance issues (or something like that) with the crank that doesn't affect safety/longevity of the motor, but causes the RMS to never quite seal 100%, so no matter what you do you always have a small RMS leak.
I dont see any leaks on the garage floor, I'll try putting a cardboard box under it. I only noticed it because I had my mechanic friend inspect the car and I told him about the rms/ims problem, he's not a porsche guy but he figured out where the ims would be located, then showed me and bam.. we saw the leak.
Ive had the car for only 2 and a half months. The previous owner had the ims and and rms seals replaced before around 2003 I think. I got an oil change 3 weeks ago, and It doesnt seem to be losing oil.
The older RMS seals were not as good as the new PTFE seals which came out around 2004 or 2005. The new PTFE RMS design from 2005 ish IIRC (came from Cayman or Cayenne IIRC) does not leak.
Early on there were reports of just a handful of cases which had out of round crank bores and so no RMS would seal, the engines were replaced by Porsche. Haven't read about any of those happening recently (in the past 8 years or more).
If the RMS was replaced in 2003 it could have been an older design that was more prone to leaks.
The IMS flange seal would have been the new design in 2003, but it can still leak. I like to use a little flange sealant in addition to the factory seal to prevent leaks. The IMS flange seal has nothing to do with bearing failure, but it does allow oil to leak out of the crank case.
Again though, seen pics of leaks much worse than that... would pull the filter and oil as bypro suggests, make sure there are no ferro magnetic particles, clean the area, monitor and continue to drive the car. You don't know how long that oil has been developing (if that is 10 years worth of leak, that is probably better than average.)
Is your Porsche seeing regular driving or is it a weekend car? I've been doing the cardboard under my engine since buying it because the oil spots are easy to spot.
