11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRennline Cyber Security Issue?
Leading reported evidence
Use paypal
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Luckily I had used PayPal to buy stuff from them, at least the last couple of times.
Leading evidence: 'Use paypal' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set off the alarm and notified me' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Use two fraudulent charges at nike.com totaling roughly $500
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
26th and had the very same credit card (Capital One) used for two fraudulent charges at NIKE.COM totaling roughly $500 on December 7th, 2018.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The larger transaction set off the alarm and notified me.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I just received a letter in the mail from Rennline Automotive in Vt. with a notice that their e-commerce site had been compromised and customer data was taken during specific periods mentioned in the letter. They seem to think that my information might have been captured, although the last 4 digits of the car that they feel has been compromised does not correspond to any of my cards. Wondering if anyone else has bought from them (I bought their really nice magnetic phone mount) and received the same letter.
...or is it a spoof?
Bob
Got the same letter today, I was wondering how my card got hacked, right about the time frame on the letter. Two charges, first for $350 which was not challanged by my card company, the second for $950+,both for a west coast forwarding company. The larger transaction set off the alarm and notified me. I called my card company and they cancelled my card and issued a new one. No real damage to me, but annoying and upsetting neverthless.
Letter stated that client information was redirected to another server since April of 2018. I froze my card and ordered a new one.
https://rennlist.com/forums/off-topi...ta-breach.html
I heard about it on Facebook.
I worried about it for a few minutes then checked how I�d paid.
Luckily I had used PayPal to buy stuff from them, at least the last couple of times.
I�m going to double check that all of my purchases were via PayPal later today.
I had a $350 fraud on my card in December my bank did not catch. Thankfully I did and they refunded it but certainly annoying. I'm sure the Rennline breach was the source and I ordered some things from them around the same time. Everyone should certainly comb back through their statements to make sure nothing got purchased by mistake.
Same thing happened to me.
I ordered some parts from Rennline on Nov. 26th and had the very same credit card (Capital One) used for two fraudulent charges at NIKE.COM totaling roughly $500 on December 7th, 2018. I caught it via a text alert sent to my phone and notified Capital One. Had to jump through the various hoops to cancel the card and obtain a new one. What is shocking to me is that (according to Rennline's letter that I received in the mail yesterday), the breach in question occurred as far back as May 28th of last year .... and yet they didnt discover it until January 18, 2019.
That's pathetic.
Breaches like this can cost a retailer heavy fines and penalties from the credit card companies.
As can be expected, they take their transaction security extremely important.
Just checked. I ordered my Rennline phone mount through Pelican instead of directly from Renline... Looks like that might have saved me a bit of headache.
the amount of companies that have these problems is getting worse, i wont even order stuff online from most companies unless they accept paypal most of the time because this happens so often
i ordered from them but paid via paypal
Perhaps its best if we order things via telephone to avoid this quagmire. More worrisome to me is that they captured not only your CC number, but name/address/and all data associated with the card including the card verification code. I agree with Diablo that with this happening all the way back to May 2018 and NOT recognizing the breach is totally pathetic in this day and age.
