13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs my IMS Shaft toast?
Leading reported evidence
Use giant drill press
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
2 weeks ago I've used the tool the remove the bearing and since the intermediate shaft was out of the engine, used a giant drill press to manually press the new bearing in.
Leading evidence: 'Use giant drill press' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace cap' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
This engine is for education purposes, and I'd like to use the bearing to practice using my LN IMS Pro tools.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
This engine is for education purposes, and I'd like to use the bearing to practice using my LN IMS Pro tools.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Use a long wooden dowel to tap the cap back into place.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
2 weeks ago I've used the tool the remove the bearing and since the intermediate shaft was out of the engine, used a giant drill press to manually press the new bearing in.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
If memory serves there's a stop in the hex hole to stop the hex oil pump key from falling into it. Sounds like your hex drive fell inside the IMS shaft.
I think you're right.
Here's what's inside:
You Tube
I could pull the IMS bearing, but I was hoping to keep it on the shaft.
This engine is for education purposes, and I'd like to use the bearing to practice using my LN IMS Pro tools.
I'm fairly certain that the 2.5L IMS shaft doesn't fit the 2.7L
The bearing on the oil pump end is smaller on the 2.5 than the 2.7.
It should work for my purposes, but kinda sucks that they sent me a defective IMS shaft.
It was guaranteed, so perhaps I should see if I can trade it for a good 2.5L shaft.
At least then I'd have a good 2.5L shaft in case someone (me?) needs it in the future.
In the pictures, the oil pump shaft was stuck in the end.
I'm guessing someone dropped it before packing it since the box doesn't look that bad and it was well packed.
.
Agree. Sounds like a single item in there. Hex drive for the oil pump sounds like a good guess.
Edit: watched the other video. Absolutely the hex drive for the oil pump. No doubt. That cap should prevent it from going in the shaft.
Some vendors (EPS) provide a punch to pop a hole in that cap, and a drive key with a slot to help oiling. It doesn't seem to be popular but some people love it... (I have a new unused EPS eternal fix kit that I bought a couple of years ago, but ended up going the LN route, figuring for the costs involved LN had a better reputation, so was less risky to me.)
Is there a way to replace the cap?
The seller has gone dark on me.
I think someone did it before it was packed.
It was well packed and the box was not in bad shape.
The pictures the seller posted had the hex drive showing.
I think you are going to have to pull the bearing. Maybe contact LN and see if they offer a service to fix it with or without bearing removal. I would reverse the charges on this part.
Here's what I'd do,
since this is just for a trainer
, not for real use. Pop out the IMS bearing with your LN tools. Tip the drive key and cap out of the end. Use a long wooden dowel to tap the cap back into place. Reinstall the bearing.
Still waiting to hear from the seller.
I was hoping for a good IMS Shaft.
Although it will be ok for what I have planned.
I just wanted a shaft so I could install IMS bearings to practice with my LN tools.
I’d like to find a damaged IMS Solution so I could perform the install of that too.
I’d like to have done it once before doing it for real in my next car or a customer’s car.
Certainly someone has had an engine failure (chain, intermix, rod, etc) that spread debris enough to damage an IMS Solution.
Just finding them would be tough.
Yeah, good idea!
A long wooden dowel with something sticky on the end to hold the cap in place might work.
Then I�ll reinstall and uninstall the bearing until it falls apart.
That cap is friction fit and isn't meant to be popped out and then re installed. I would return it to the seller. You paid for a good usable part and this isn't one.
2 weeks ago I've used the tool the remove the bearing and since the intermediate shaft was out of the engine, used a giant drill press to manually press the new bearing in. There really isn't much to it that needs practicing. Can't be that much different to use the tool to install it. The concept is the same regardless what you use.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.