19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew Guy w/ Pics
Leading reported evidence
Replace rear tires twice and the fronts
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
one question: i've replaced my rear tires twice and the fronts once.
Leading evidence: 'Replace rear tires twice and the fronts' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace rear tires twice and the fronts' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T194705Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
greetings,
new to the board and wanted to include some pics...i've enjoyed the posts by all over the past year and decided it was time to finally post myself up.
bought this car in 2003 with 9,000 miles on it. '99 c2 cab and she's been great to me. i've done 1 autocross event that i really enjoyed and will do more. currently has 36,000 miles and i've never had a problem. no mods yet, i guess i'll wait until something needs to be replaced.
anyways, just wanted to say hey.
thanks, i wouldn't mind replacing the front bumper or adding some subwoofers...the subwoofers will be my first mod. i found some enclosures that would work well in the backseat footwells but they were pretty pricey...as far as the front bumper anything that sits a little lower.
i see what you mean though, my mind is already starting to wander...PSE?, side skirts?, supercharger?...i don't think it would ever end.
Jim - BE NICE! Let him get to at least 5 post before you start drooling over his chick! And don't tell him that you think that no bra is better than a clear bra. He might think you are still talking about his chick!
RX2476
- Welcome to the Porsche Phunny Pharm! Thanks for sharing the pics. I'm in Concord, NC. Hope to run into you some time... well, not literally run into you!
it is a car thread - just more pic's of the car please.
Mods - get rid of the orange side markers. For $30 or less you cannot beat that as the 1st mod!
thanks for all the comments...i can't say how much i love the car. it brings a smile to my face every day. i have to say its the most solid well built car i've ever owned. i redline it everyday and i think the car loves me for it.
one question: i've replaced my rear tires twice and the fronts once. the fronts have plenty of tread left but have 22,000 miles on them. they do look like someone ran a cheese grater over them and they make a lot of noise. my buddy said they were "chunked" and needed to be replaced. do you guys think this is necessary or should i put another 15,000 miles before i replace them?...the rears are brand new.
can anything bad happen if i don't replace them or will the tires just keep getting louder? i know its kind of a stupid question but tires are $$$.
again thanks for all the comments and making me feel welcome to the board.
I saw a Ford GT up close the other day... I guess the bumper law that messes up the 911's front ride height is messing up the GT. That thing needs to be lowered 2" in the front just to match the rear ride height. Really detracts from the overall look of the car.
